db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 11 days agoThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1109arrow-down1imageThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 days agoThey are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
minus-squareTh4tGuyII@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 days agoConsidering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
minus-squareo7___o7@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 days ago“Decepticons” is right there!
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 days agowe call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·10 days agoYes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.
They are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
“Decepticons” is right there!
we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
Yes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.