• GTG3000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, an ebike + light rail is enough to explore a city and it’s surroundings, but I can think of a few places I’ve visited in my life that would be basically inaccessible without a car.

    …or a very, very long roundtrip on train, I suppose. For like two of them.

    Still, shouldn’t need a car in an urban area.

    • h14h@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There definitely have been, and continue to be, some great experiences in my life that would have been impossible without a car.

      But they happen so infrequently that owning a car myself is completely nonsensical from a cost perspective.

      Much better to spend a couple hundred bucks a year renting/borrowing a car the 2-3 times I need one, than $10k a year on payments/gas/insurance/parking just so it can take up valuable urban land to sit unused 99% of its life.

      • GTG3000@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. The only mode of transportation that I own is an ebike. And I could probably cut the “e” part out without too much fuss.

        Good panier bags make all the difference though.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most people are ok with cars in rural settings but cars don’t work very well in urban areas.

      If you didn’t own a car you could still rent one to go out camping or something. I don’t understand why everyone needs to own a 23MPG offroad trail destroyer stegosaurus to maybe go camping twice a year.

      • GTG3000@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Renting is exactly what we did :D Can’t very well bring a whole ass car with you on a plane. Nor should you want to.