• bastion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a much more reasonable argument than most.

    But third and fourth-gen nuclear are excellent sources of constant energy that don’t require storage, and some of which have a tiny percentage of the waste stream of prior generations, and what waste they do produce is problematic along the lines of 400 years (as opposed to 27,000 years).

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Third and fourth gen can also use the waste that’s currently being warehoused as well. So they’ll be reducing environmental impact that’s caused by the current waste stream.