I originally chose to make my account on lemmy.world since all the content seemed to come from there. But I’ve since learned that I can fill my feed with stuff from any instance so it feels like it doesn’t actually matter if I’m on lemmy.world or not. At the same time, Lemmy.world seems to be frequently under attack so I’m wondering if I should change instance but have no idea what I should even be looking for when choosing.

  • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would a smaller instance not be more likely to have weaker support, or more prone to shutting down and taking you with it?

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      that all depends on the instance. small does not mean it will go away. for example my instance is topical. by design, even if it gets “popular” it has some in-built upper limits and if the mass grows beyond them it means I can likely get help paying for the next steps up.

      just because an instance is big does not mean its necessarily safe or stable, first its imporant to note that large instances have scaling issues as the deployment for the system is not ready to scale that way, instead they need to deploy to every bigger servers in an inefficient manner or spend a ton of time rolling bespoke deploys. these big servers are just a few volunteers. some big instances are managed by 1-4 technical people, the same numbers a small instance has.

      Also it costs money to run large scaled systems, you can run an instance for you and some friends for nearly free if you find a deal and only a few bucks a month if you dont.

      So big instance/ small instance does not mean much with stability, they both have thier issues. Something to note, smaller instances are MUCH easier to run.

      • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It feels like starting a new instance is the trendy thing to do, similar to creating some new crypto shitcoin a few years ago. Of course, nothing is guaranteed, but I would imagine more deeply rooted instances would generally offer more support and be less likely to disappear.

        • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          haha no, instances like this pre-date centralized systems, e-cash and everything else. instead of something hip and new, you are doing something very old, like they way the internet was designed to operate old.

          i was running sites like these a decade before reddit came to the fore. The thing that’s “new and weird” is this desire to pile onto a single domain handing control of your feed, personal information and more to a billionaire. If you are into wealth gospel i get it, though they haven’t done as much to earn trust as people seem to think.

          AOL and Compuserve went under for all the same reasons the majors are struggling now.

          • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m onboard with these decentralized platforms. I’m not questioning the value of this federation system, but the potential volatility of parts of it. The concept of an '‘instance’ may be old, but that seems to be a new buzzword fit for abuse.

            • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it already has been abused, you came here a bit late and missed the fireworks, there was a massive expulsion of badly behaving instances by many of the instances wanting to remain connected. I was actually quite surprised and impressed at the speed at which admins collectively decided and acted across the network. I actually suspect the ratio of mods:users to be higher here. The ratio of admins:users def is.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They might have smaller supports, but they are much less likely to be targets of ddos attacks and bots.

    • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally, yes, though technically it can happen to any instance with a small or single-person admin team. If an instance has multiple admins it is far less likely that it will one day just die.