Right, and they are comfortable with it when they think it’s in their favor. Just like progressives.
I’m mentioning progressives because a progressive is much likelier to read what I write here than a conservative, if that wasn’t clear from the beginning.
That’s my point, there are two crowds feeding the dragon hoping that it’ll incinerate the other crowd. The dragon takes dragon cookies from one crowd, then eats someone from another crowd, making the first crowd cheer. Then takes dragon cookies from another crowd and bites somebody from the first crowd, making the second crowd cheer. It’s a big fat happy dragon.
But as you confirmed, you weren’t making a point that applies to any particular political ideology. Really more of an obvious, shallow statement that you dressed up a little.
If you assume your audience is mostly progressive, then you can just state your point, and let probability do its thing.
Really doesn’t make sense to tack that on there unless you’re just laying lazy bait.
Well, I just don’t have sufficient focus for trolling with effort.
This really gets boring though, so should try elfing (basically instead of arguing with somebody to test them you agree with somebody and flatter them to test them until they start feeling weird).
Right, and they are comfortable with it when they think it’s in their favor. Just like progressives.
I’m mentioning progressives because a progressive is much likelier to read what I write here than a conservative, if that wasn’t clear from the beginning.
That’s my point, there are two crowds feeding the dragon hoping that it’ll incinerate the other crowd. The dragon takes dragon cookies from one crowd, then eats someone from another crowd, making the first crowd cheer. Then takes dragon cookies from another crowd and bites somebody from the first crowd, making the second crowd cheer. It’s a big fat happy dragon.
But as you confirmed, you weren’t making a point that applies to any particular political ideology. Really more of an obvious, shallow statement that you dressed up a little.
If you assume your audience is mostly progressive, then you can just state your point, and let probability do its thing.
Really doesn’t make sense to tack that on there unless you’re just laying lazy bait.
Removed by mod
Got it, so lazy trolling.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Well, I just don’t have sufficient focus for trolling with effort.
This really gets boring though, so should try elfing (basically instead of arguing with somebody to test them you agree with somebody and flatter them to test them until they start feeling weird).