• volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I get the whole post isn’t super serious but for real, I doubt that getting rid of Hitler-Hitler would have stopped the rise of fascism and nazis. There would have just been another leader who might have caused even greater damage.

        • Hyggyldy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think often such things merely accelerate the time line. I’m pretty sure the urge to go look at the big shiny thing in the sky has been with us a looong time. We would have gotten there eventually one way or another.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would also probably go even faster if we just stopped requiring things to be “”“economical”“” to get research.

        • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s sadly a very good point. I work in the biomedical sphere and it is an uncomfortable topic that a lot of our knowledge would not exist without the horrible experiments done on people during the second world war.

      • nxfsi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or fascism may become the new trend in democracy because it didn’t get associated with genocide…

      • suspecm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We would have gotten a communist germany. The first big enemy Hitler and his nazi party had to defeat were the communists who were operating similar death gangs to their gestapo.