If independent consultant model doesn’t work

What are some good alternatives? Or just create a government auditing agent to continue monitor such contracts and hold them accountable?

  • Yendor@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The APS pay scale defines the salary of everyone working for the federal government. Your pay is determined by your level. Your level is (mostly) determined by how senior your are in the Organisational Chart, and the OrgChart basically shows how many people work under you. So the only way to earn more is to manage more people. This results in people who are highly skilled in a subject matter doing middle-management instead, because that’s what happens when you get promoted. It simply reinforces the Peter Principle, resulting in a hierarchy where no one is doing the job they are best suited to. In the APS, you can’t get to $100k without becoming a manager.

    https://www.apsc.gov.au/remuneration-reports/australian-public-service-remuneration-report-2021/chapter-3-base-salary

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle

    Private companies don’t do that. If you’re very good at something, they can pay you well for it, they won’t force you to take on management just to get a raise. It means people can do what they’re best at, and you can attract and retain the best people to fill the roles you need.

    I’ve worked with engineers on $200k+ working under a supervisor on $110k, because the engineer is highly skilled in a particular technology, while the supervisor was a graduate who got their MBA a couple of years after graduating and are working their way up the corporate ladder.

    • hikarulsi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for the great detail.

      You are right, requiring one to be at management level to increase pay is a waste of talents and waste of taxpayers money.