• Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Logic and reason from billions of people’s shared experiences on the earth.

    Feel free to die and return and prove me wrong.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So, you’re saying Jesus didn’t rise from the dead because it’s impossible. And that we know it’s impossible because nobody’s risen from the dead, which should include Jesus because you reject that he rose from the dead because it’s impossible.

      Isn’t this circular reasoning?

      • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure. Whenever discussing religion one will fall into circular reasoning, because faith itself is circular reasoning. One cannot use logic or reason to get out of a position that logic and reason did not get them into.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Then our belief in anything can be put to circular reasoning

              • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not exactly. Some things can be proven. But regarding things that happened thousands of years ago? Yeah that’s just everyone’s best guess and personal beliefs.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  We can’t prove that anne frank existed though. Those videos of her could have been an actress. The story could have been an elaborate rouse. Etc, etc

                  You believe that anne frank existed because you believe that she existed, etc, etc

          • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And forgive me for my use of “impossible” earlier, that’s not my position.

            “Highly improbable” is a way better qualifier.

            Not going to edit it because it ruins the context.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well, it is highly improbable, because only a few people have, either by this aforementioned person or himself. And it requires supernatural powers.

              • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Right, and it’s much more likely that some true stories about a great dude got exaggerated a little bit over 2000 years, and vanishingly less likely that magic is real.

                But both are absolutely possible.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The Jesus we believe in was written about 2000 years ago. Our beliefs haven’t changed.