• NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mercury

    Venus

    Earth

    Mars

    Jupiter

    Saturn

    Uranus

    Neptune

    PLUTO

    Cold dead hands. Cold. Dead. Hands!

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      PLUTO

      DID IT CLEAR ITS ORBIT?!?

      I say again, did… Pluto… CLEAR… ITS… ORBIT?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean… yes?

          The phrase refers to an orbiting body (a planet or protoplanet) “sweeping out” its orbital region over time, by gravitationally interacting with smaller bodies nearby. Over many orbital cycles, a large body will tend to cause small bodies either to accrete with it, or to be disturbed to another orbit, or to be captured either as a satellite or into a resonant orbit. As a consequence it does not then share its orbital region with other bodies of significant size, except for its own satellites, or other bodies governed by its own gravitational influence. This latter restriction excludes objects whose orbits may cross but that will never collide with each other due to orbital resonance, such as Jupiter and its trojans, Earth and 3753 Cruithne, or Neptune and the plutinos.[3] As to the extent of orbit clearing required, Jean-Luc Margot emphasises “a planet can never completely clear its orbital zone, because gravitational and radiative forces continually perturb the orbits of asteroids and comets into planet-crossing orbits” and states that the IAU did not intend the impossible standard of impeccable orbit clearing.[2]

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood