• 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    the regular jellyfin app is just a web wrapper, at least it behaves like and looks like it, as for advantages, it’s the little things, like offline playback, double tap to skip like in youtube etc.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Interesting because the jellyfin app can double tap to skip as well as download media for offline playback.

      I have both and UI seems like the only difference between the two (findroid looks MUCH better) except you have no access to any admin, profile, or library settings or functions (like scanning for new media or fixing metadata) in findroid.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The official app does download files for offline viewing, but it downloads the file to your downloads folder, like a web browser.

        Findroid downloads the file to the apps internal storage and plays it back in-app.

        Some other platform-native third party JF apps like JellyFlix and Streamyfin allow you to transcode your downloads for smaller files, different resolution, and file compatibility. They also download to the app storage and play back in-app

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Might just be me, but I don’t like double tap to skip. Findroid has another scrubbing method I’ve not seen anywhere else but I wish it were the standard.

      When you drag your finger to the right, it says how far you’re about to skip ahead. The longer your swipe, the further you go. When you release, it scrubs to that timestamp. Same with going backwards.

      I find it faster, more accurate, and more versatile. The only thing I don’t like about the Findroid player is the UI timeout is twice as long as I need it to be.