EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io. Please don’t abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Not going to be a popular opinion but that doesn’t surprise me at all, almost certainly breaks their tos.

    I think people should focus more on stuff like peertube that doesn’t just piggyback off another service against said service provider’s wishes

    • Wave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      None of the creators I want to follow are on peertube, and I have no social media to ask them to move, nor do I want to engage with those platforms.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Which at the end of the day is your choice, as much as it’s theirs not to use foss tools like mastodon and peertube

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Like wanting to donate but they only offer proprietary, big corpo middlemen options like Patreon or Paypal or Microsoft GitHub Sponsors where they scrape off the top without adding any value.

        • Wave@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah this is also a frustration I have. I dont want to sign up for patreon or Google just to support someone. Give me a Kofi, liberapay or monero option.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Sure, I agree, but at the end of the day it’s useful to be able to search and watch YouTube videos so long as it’s a popular platform because it still has by far the bulk of topics covered.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You can do that through their own interface though, there are browser extensions to do all the things invidious did anyway

        Not like going to the website will cause your computer to blow up or something, if privacy is the concern there are plenty of ways to anonymise it

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Title is kinda misleading. The issue only affects public instances, and it has been an ongoing problem since many months ago. Basically the moment youtube detects lots of traffic from one IP it gets blocked, and need sign-in.

    It seems this block just became harder to work around, and they started blocking all IPs from hosting providers, but I’m sure a solution will be found eventually.

    If you have a spare laptop/PC/raspberry pi you can host your own invidious in your home. It won’t get blocked, it will be much faster, and you can use options that are usually disabled on public instances (the API and DASH quality).

    Then you can add something like tailscale/twingate into the mix to access it outside your home. Self hosted wireguard can also work if your ISP gives you a static IP or you setup a DDNS service. I personally use twingate because I don’t like opening any port in my router.

    • ironsoap@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I appreciate the cogent context and solution oriented post.

      I’d also say though that from a privacy standpoint self-hosting invidious is still allowing GeoIP info to be attached to downloaded videos, which is a fingerprint which can be used by data mining. Admittedly rather abstract as in this case the primary point of deplatforming might just be to de-ad, or give better video control, etc, and not obfuscate for privacy sake.

      As I said though great points!

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        i feel like this makes it on par with eg newpipe right? since newpipe doesn’t have a server, so all requests are direct to youtube

        people seem to be okay with the fingerprint trade-off… and a vpn (as in, an external vpn that invidious routes all traffic through) would help with that

    • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I feel like I only know just enough about docker containers to get myself into trouble.

      I’ve ran a few docker containers for things like Minecraft Bedrock for my kid and his friends and a local Ubooquity server and stuff like that but I’m wondering if anyone has made a guide for glutun VPN bind + an Invidious instance with tailscale/twingate setup you mentioned.

      I am just an iPhone pleb who really loved using Yattee while it worked and assume a similar setup to what you described would allow me to point my Yattee to the self-hosted instance.

  • whoareu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was expected since it makes sense to cut off users that don’t generate any revenue. YouTube has now became like Instagram or Facebook where you have to make an account to view anything on their platform

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because they still want to support embedded video you can still watch using apps from your own IP or download using yt-dlp

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Need to use alternatives to YouTube and move the creators to, YouTube is shitting on our face day after day, and the problem is that we can’t hide ourselves to access them since they are blocking Tor and datacenters adresses… Good luck!

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    The day I can no longer download videos from YouTube will be the day I take a step back from it altogether…

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      Never. Even if yt blocks the program from downloading from its site, it can still pull from like 10,000 other sites. I doubt google could do anything to actually stop the software from being distributed. We all know how that goes.

      It is a very useful piece of software. I’ve never used it to actually download a youtube video.

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      yt-dl was “shut down” at one point. That led to vastly more interest and the birth of yt-dlp. I think they learned their lesson.

    • sovietknuckles[they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      yt-dlp now suffers from the same issue that Invidious does: uncircumventable rate-limiting based on IP address.

      You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

      Same for yt-dlp, currently: It works from your residential IP address, but not a datacenter IP address like a VPN.

      If you get Sign in to confirm that you’re not a bot or This helps protect our community. in yt-dlp, do not actually try to sign in, because that will get your account banned (see yt-dlp/yt-dlp#10128).

      So once a solution is found for Invidious, yt-dlp will be able use it too, and vice versa.