• piecat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Proper EMC requires good design, additional components, and good shielding.

    Components and shielding add cost directly, but also increase weight, which is probably millions times more expensive in fuel.

    I bet they cheaped out on their shielding. Especially given the volume of sats they’re trying to use.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Last I heard it was something like $3K a kilogram to get a ride on falcon. Compared to their cost overall for each unit it’s pennies.

      We used to shield the hell out of everything, but we’ve gotten away from that in recent decades. We’re getting particularly good at generating only the frequencies we need.

      I’m thinking that they made a last minute business decision to push the amplifiers too hard, or maybe they decided not to update the tech and just push it harder.

      There’s no way they didn’t run basic testing on the hardware to make sure that it was putting out appropriate frequencies.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Someone had to have signed off on a mission assurance spec waiver if they’re leaking a lot of EMI. If they didn’t check with the FCC on this they might be in big trouble. Who am I kidding? This was probably done with their blessing.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Multiple countries claim jurisdiction over their LEO area, especially for launching stuff from their country.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Currently, there are no regulations that address the leakage of unintended electromagnetic radiation from constellation satellites.

        From the article.