superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square236fedilinkarrow-up11.55Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.53Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square236fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down1·3 days agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down1·3 days agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·2 days agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)