• Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No one forces you to spend a thousand dollars on a 4090. An RTX 3060 will outperform a PS5 by a big margin, and for under 200 bucks

        • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Where I live, the cheapest 3060 is 260€ (including 19% tax). A 4090 is almost two grand. That’s the equivalent of two of the upcoming PS5 Pros with a couple of games.

          • SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It certainly doesn’t outperform 80 and 90 series cards. The 70 series cards have always been performant budget oriented cards, not the top end but pretty good performance for the cost. 4070 and ti are not that.

            • brachypelmasmithi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh jeez I didn’t realise you were talking in context of just the 40 series and thought you meant all the cards 😅 My mistake.

      • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You’re right, a 4090 costs 2-3 consoles.

        Let’s assume the 3060 costs 180 Dollars (no idea what those go for). Add 150 for a decent CPU, 40 for 16 GB of memory. Another 80 for a Mainboard for a total of 180+150+40+80=450 USD. You also need a case, a power supply and mass storage. Your math doesn’t check out, even with the humble specs those Dollars will buy you.

        I’m not trying to sell you a console here, far from it. I’m just saying if you want a rig that outperforms a console, it will be in the 4-digits. A mid range GPU alone will be 400-500 nowadays.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Add 150 for a decent CPU, 40 for 16 GB of memory. Another 80 for a Mainboard for a total of 180+150+40+80=450 USD

          You could have at least spent 2 minutes looking up prices instead of making stuff up. A Ryzen 5600 is $110 and a compatible motherboard $50. That CPU outperforms the PS5 and Xbox Series X by a big margin

          I’m just saying if you want a rig that outperforms a console, it will be in the 4-digits.

          No, you don’t. Here is a list that I quickly threw together. It has a much better CPU and GPU than current gen consoles, and 1TB of SSD storage, for “only” $550

          PCPartPicker Part List

          Type Item Price
          CPU AMD Ryzen 5 5600 3.5 GHz 6-Core Processor $114.83 @ Amazon
          Motherboard ASRock B450M-HDV R4.0 Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard $59.99 @ Amazon
          Memory G.Skill Aegis 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 Memory $29.99 @ Newegg
          Storage TEAMGROUP MS30 1 TB M.2-2280 SATA Solid State Drive $46.99 @ Amazon
          Video Card Gigabyte EAGLE Radeon RX 6600 8 GB Video Card $199.97 @ Newegg
          Case Thermaltake V100 Perforated ATX Mid Tower Case $47.99 @ Best Buy
          Power Supply EVGA 500 W1 500 W 80+ Certified ATX Power Supply $47.99 @ Amazon
          Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts
          Total $547.75
          Generated by PCPartPicker 2024-09-11 10:35 EDT-0400
          • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only thing you have to consider is, that a B450 Motherboard isn’t out of the box compatible with a Ryzen 5, but an out of the box compatible Motherboard isn’t that much more expensive.

          • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not relevant. Games for consoles are much more optimized because there are just a few configurations.

            A PC with similar specs as a console will very likely have worse performance if you compare them.

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You also have less ability to mod the games so you lose out on some of those features. For example doing is level FSR like the steam deck.

                • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  One reason I mentioned the steam decks FSR feature. Which is a really cool example of this to me. Of wise spread automatic modding making every game that can run on the system potentially better with no additional effort from the dev.

              • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                What are you taking about? Your barebones configuration is a hundred dollars more than the standard PS5 years after its initial release. The PS 5 Pro (subject of your link) promises significantly more power than the original model and costs significantly more. You cannot compare that to your bare bones gaming PC. A gaming PC that promises way more bang than your 5600+6600 combo is significantly more expensive than the PS5 Pro.

                Your hastily assembled list will maybe do 1080p60 in more recent games, severely limited by the GPU and its 8GB of VRAM. That was good when I got my 430 EUR Vega 56 back in 2017. Today? Not so great.

                • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m a third party in this chat, not Anivia@feddit.org.

                  Your initial comment here was pointing out that a component of a computer build is as expensive as an entire console. Valid point, though it does ignore that the component you had in mind is superior to what Sony’s put into their machine. It’s not really an apples to apples comparison. More like an apple from the grocery compared to picking a basket of apples from an orchard.

                  You seem to be pointing out that higher performance per dollar is possible with a high end computer. This is correct.

                  Anivia on the other hand was only saying that for the same money or less as a Playstation 5 Pro, you can get more performance by spending your dollars on a computer instead of a console. This is correct.

                  You two seem to be saying the same thing: Sony’s console is overpriced for what it is, and a better experience can be had going with a pc.

                  • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Anivia on the other hand was only saying that for the same money or less as a Playstation 5 Pro, you can get more performance by spending your dollars on a computer instead of a console. This is correct.

                    I’d like to argue that you can’t get as much or more performance by spending the 700 dollars on a gaming PC. I’d be glad to be proven wrong when the first PS 5 Pro benchmarks are published, however.