• kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Fellow – sharing a particular activity, quality, or condition with someone or something.

      So yeah - that part was covered. Also “man” in this context is short for Human, not man as in male.

      Reading comprehension for the win!

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        ‘fellow man’ is normally used to mean any other human, not only those with certain traits

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean, if you just wanted to let everyone know that you’re prejudiced, you could have just come out and said it directly.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            Reading comprehension is not your strong point is it.

            You said fellowman, as in you believe the only people in Europe who care about other people at all are Muslims. Seeing as this is too ridiculous to be your meaning we are left to wonder.

            Did you not mean to say Muslims would be concerned about what is happening to fellow Muslims?

            • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Critical thinking isn’t your strong suit, is it?

              He said fellow man, not fellowman, as in he is suggesting that people in France and Germany take exception to the indiscriminate murder of other human beings, of any religious affiliation, taking place as a result of the Israeli occupation of Gaza.

              How you weren’t able to comprehend this with your clearly superior reading comprehension skills is a mystery that is too ridiculous to comprehend, so we are left to wonder.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                That’s because France and Germany have the largest Muslim populations in Europe. Turns out, they don’t like their fellow man being murdered indiscriminately.

                He is referring to the Muslim population, not that people in France and Germany as a whole do.

                • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  My brother in Christ, there is no fix for stupid, and for that I’m sorry. Best of luck in your future endeavors, I can tell you’re going to need it.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or with Martians? The point is they mostly care about this particular conflict is because it’s muslims that are getting slaughtered

        • roboto@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Even when you’re not a Muslim you can easily acknowledge that genocide against Muslims is as bad as against anyone else. And if you ask Muslims on the question of genocide against anyone I’m sure the answer wouldn’t differ to genocide against Muslims, because it’s such a natural thing to oppose genocide.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Well that’s the point, innit? Do we see the same level of reaction for Darfur, Burkina Faso, Saudi-Arabia, …

            • roboto@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I keep hearing this „but what about Sudan?“ kind of thing. I mean also what about the children in Gaza vs the outrage when Israeli children are getting killed.

              The goal of the protests for Palestine is to overcome imperialism and colonialism as a whole. The movement won’t stop when Palestine is free but only when everyone is free.

              That we don’t see the same reaction for the people of Sudan is part of the problem, not a reason to delegitimize the pro-Palestine movement.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                But that’s my exactly my point: you don’t see the MP from this post asking for the athletes of any of those other countries to be banned. Doesn’t that make him part of the problem? Does the fact that he only seems to care about one very particular conflict (as per the comment we’re replying on: “because he’s in a country with a large muslim population”) not make his concern seem insincere?