• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        The world of a hundred years ago. Where I live, the liberal parties mostly want to create more freedom for companies to fuck people over.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          US liberals and US conservatives both share the core ideals of Liberalism, including the right to private property

          They differ only in where they think individual liberty ends.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Overton Window, maybe, but that’s not a particularly useful categorization. Parties represent relatively fixed views, not directions.

          • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            In the US it’s a spectrum combining party policy and Overton Window. As you move left, you go deeper and deeper into increasingly extreme thoughts on policy regarding what we consider classic liberal topics such as social justice, corporate power, various societal and economic reforms, etc till it hits an extreme that’s considered radical to the average, the same goes for the right and classic conservative views.

            Hugging the middle/mixed gray zone are the Centrist.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think you’re a bit confused on terms.

              Social Justice isn’t really a “Liberal” topic. It’s a topic many US Liberals generally are progressive on, but that doesn’t make it “Liberal.” Liberalism is also not about reforming the economy but maintaining “healthy” Capitalism.

              Liberal views are therefore views in line with Liberalism itself, and Liberal Parties like the DNC represent Liberalism and movements towards Liberalism, not movements towards the left.

              Social Democracy, ie what Scandinavian Countries have, would be centrist.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        USA

        Liberal in the US means progressive. It’s a term referring to social issues, not economic ones.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Liberal in the USA means Liberal economically, it’s just that economic Liberalism is more progressive than the alternstive, far-right populism.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Liberal in the USA means Liberal economically

            No, it absolutely does not. You are lying.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yes it does. The Liberals in the US support Liberalism. Calling someone a Liberal means they support Liberalism in the US.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                You are a liar and you keep spreading this bullshit. Both sides in the US support economic liberalism. The US exclusively uses the term “liberal” to refer to social issues.

                You can argue about whether that’s a good definition or not, but you CANNOT argue about whether that’s actually how it’s used in the US, both in everyday usage and political journalism.

                You are spreading this shit because you like to intentionally blur the difference between Democrats and Republicans.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Both sides in the US support Capitalism, but the far-right is far more populist.

                  I am not trying to blur the difference between the Democrats and Republicans.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Then why are you trying to push this idea that “liberal” = “fiscally liberal”? Not only is it not true, it’s not even useful, as we have words like “capitalist” to describe the similar economic thinking between Democrats and Republicans (and I’m using similar very loosely here, it’s only similar when compared to something like socialism).