If you ever wanted to read about fake druids vs. environmental activists, now’s your chance.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah I don’t know why they wouldn’t block the entrance to an oil refinery. Some people would be unhappy about this especially the people that work there. But the general public could understand, who knows it could possibly slow production for a few days.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They have. Compared to this, it got barely any news coverage.

      That is why they do this. Their only goal is attention, and they do that quite well.

      The way they seem to operate is quite smart, actually:

      • Their stunts get a lot of press and bring climate change to the forefront of people’s minds, frequently.

      • They’re not a political party, so pissing voters off isn’t a problem. They can afford to be unpopular to further the cause.

      • Those who already care about the climate won’t change that based on a small group they dislike.

      • Those who call them “terrorists” are people who call anything short of licking oil company boot “eco-terrorism”. They were never going to be convinced to care whatever the group does. Probably read the Daily Mail.

      • Those who are apathetic about the climate are still going to be apathetic, with a bit of rage towards this group as with the others, but again, ultimately that doesn’t matter as they still won’t change anything based on a single group.

      • A small handful of people will be inspired by them and their constant reminders of climate crisis, and be motivated to push for change.

      The last bullet seems to be the target audience of the group. And they’re the ones who will actually do anything.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They silence a lot of people fighting for climate change by making it harder for everyone to discuss this. They make it much harder every time they pull one of these stunts. Its not smart unless you’re talking about the oil industry execs funding them

        • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          “Silence”? How?

          They don’t make it harder to discuss climate change. People don’t just go “a small group I hate cares about climate change so now I don’t care”. And if they do, well, they never actually cared about the climate. They cared about looking good and were never going to help with anything.

          And stop with the conspiracy that they’re funded by oil executives. The organisation of the granddaughter of an oil billionaire (who is dead) funds 2% of them. Because, children and grandchildren, believe it or not, can disagree with their elders.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            People don’t just go “a small group I hate cares about climate change so now I don’t care”.

            No they don’t, but if I want to talk about the same cause to try to change people’s minds, instead I have to explain away a bunch of extremists and try to get them to take the cause seriously despite those extremists

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s 100% not a conspiracy and you can go back to find many climate organizations have been infiltrated by agent provocateurs since the 70s. The FBI sent a guy in had a kid and pulled him out leaving an entire family. Industries have lots of leaked documents showing their support for these groups because they’re so unpalatable to the average person.

            These groups behavior often make it harder. It distracts from the fight and puts a giant clown hat on the whole issue. People will argue “it’s not permanent damage” without realizing the point that underlies that. This is about image. Its not about actual effect. Image is valuable and these people think that damaging the image somehow is the key to action because it gets people talking. Its not the 70s anymore everyone knows. We need these groups to be more self aware and create civil action to get people on board instead of making it unpalatable. Or just stop and give room for groups or drive positive change.

            • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              many climate organizations have been infiltrated

              Ok but:

              1. you’re talking about the US, JSO is UK based

              2. It is a conspiracy theory because you have no hard evidence that JSO is infiltrated and having it’s strings pulled by big oil like you claim

              It distracts from the fight

              No I’d actually argue it brings the fight to the forefront of people’s minds, specifically the people who are actually inclined to do something. Those who do nothing but complain about climate activism were never going to do anything useful and so their thoughts on the methods are frankly irrelevant since the methods work for those who actually want to act.

              We need these groups to be more self aware and create civil action to get people on board instead of making it unpalatable.

              They’ve blockaded oil terminals and vandalised terrible offenders driving climate change, and still do. It was nowhere near as effective as their publicity stunts, which get people talking. They just ended up getting whisked away by police and largely ignored by the news. Pointless.

              Whether you like it or not, the sort of quiet, non-inconvenient activism you seem to be proposing has shown itself to be useless.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Their only goal is attention

        This is not scammy advertising where “any attention is good attention”. This is an important cause where we need to build support

        They can afford to be unpopular to further the cause.

        Sure, no donations, no popular support, they can just be marginalized and ignored as a bunch of extremists. Everyone cheers when the cops cart them off to jail. Yay for attention though

        Those who are apathetic about the climate are still going to be apathetic, with a bit of rage

        This is where they’re wrong, and where I’m especially frustrated when it’s a cause I agree with. All those middle ground or non-active people who could be wooed as supporters, will now dismiss the cause as a bunch of annoying kooks. Nobody caused change by driving away potential supporters