I discovered Resonate today, immediately became a member and have been discovering lovely new music all evening.

I quit Spotify a few years ago when I realized that most artists get pennies while a few really big names get enormous payouts.

Seeing an artist and user owned streaming service, completely open sourced under GPL 3.0 and with a thriving community where everything is developed in the open – it really made my day.

Yes, their catalogue is still tiny compared to every other streaming service, but the music I have listened to today is of really good quality. I will still listen to and buy music from other services like Bandcamp, but I became a member of Resonate also because I really want such a service to exist and thrive!

What do you think?

  • 0x00cl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s not open source afaik. I couldn’t find a link to a git repository on their website, had to go on twitter to find a tweet where they had a link. Apparently they open source some of their tools only. https://resonate.github.io/

  • abbenm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Thank you for recommending this! This is exactly the kind of thing I hope to find on Lemmy.’ I wanted to figure out how much it costs because it’s a little unclear even on the pricing page. But I see it looks like to pay as you stream up to $11.20.

    I will say, I love this way of thinking about their catalog:

    the explorer

    “I want something new every day.”

    10€ ($11.20) at Resonate provides around 4 hours of listening a day – 30 days a month – to wander our catalog.

    How can you say a catalog is limited when you get 4 hours of new music a day?? It’s a good way of thinking of it.

    It doesn’t appear to be FOSS, but they do say under “what’s next”:

    How can we support and collaborate with each other, not just between artists and listeners, but across like-minded platforms?

    • rsolva@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      How can you say a catalog is limited when you get 4 hours of new music a day?? It’s a good way of thinking of it.

      I was referring to the limited amount of artists, no big names as of yet – but that does not bother me. I like listening to new and lesser known artists. There is so much good music out there!

      But I see it looks like you pay as you stream up to $11.20

      It is not a hard cap at $11.20, it is just one example of how much you would spend in a month listening to new music for 4 hours a day. Their model is based on gradually increasing the price every time you stream a song. First stream of a song costs you (less than?) 1 cent. The sixth time you listen to a song, you would have paid about 10 cents and by the ninth listen you have paid for it in full (about a dollar in total) and you will not have to pay any more to listen to it, as you now own it.

      Exponential price increase

      In other words; exploring new music is quite cheap, and when you find a track, artist or album that you really like, you will pay a fair price and own it after the ninth listen. And if you do not stream for a while, you’re paying nothing, as there is no monthly fee. I have to say I really like this pricing model!

      It doesn’t appear to be FOSS

      Yes it is, but I will add a proposal where I suggest that this is mention on their landing page, or at least have a link to the repo in the footer.

      Btw, it is a great feeling to be a member of such a project, not just a “user” like with Spotify. As a listener and member, I have voting rights and can also influence the development of this project.