• Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      But there’s no “biological” reason for that. In the same way, skirts/dresses being for women and suits/ties being for men, leg hair, haircuts, voice, mannerisms, emotional availability, all get tied one gender or another.

      We, in our society, have associated some properties to one of two genders. Some of these properties tend to be associated to one sex (sex being a more “biological” thing (but still not binary or unchangeable!)), but many of them are just expectations we put upon people. This is what “gender is a social construct” means; that the general understanding and intuition about gender is constructed by the society in which we live. Different societies may have more than 2 genders or completely different sets of associations.

      Unfortunately these categorizations are bad for a significant portion of the population, including trans people, gender non-confirming people, but even cishet people; how many times have you heard of some act making you “not a real man” (eg crying for a movie)?

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Historically neither.

      Red signifies passion and anger (male traits), and pink is the softer version of red for younger boys or representing flowers for women.

      13-14th century you would have both represented by both genders, and late 1800’s was when it started to diverge.