• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    And remember, because I feel this always needs to be said with such sums…

    193 million isn’t enough for him, and 193 million plus whatever millions he made in years prior isn’t enough for him. He’s going public because he’s a broken, disturbed human being that looks at his unethical levels of wealth, enough for most of the other humans that live here to live 2 dozen extravagant lifetimes, and still demands mooooooaaaaaar.

    Why isn’t this widely accepted as severe mental illness?! This is hoarding disorder.

    These aren’t big ocean house sums. These are buying politicians sums, and they are only achievable through exploiting other human beings and selfishly pocketing most of the value of their labor because you can get away with it.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is it possible to set a roof on private wealth? Everything above put into public funds? Give them a “you win at capitalism” trophy and let them into some other game to play.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the absence of cap also makes super rich people motivated to invest in new projects that could make them even richer. If they don’t have this motivation anymore, it may reduce this investment source, they’d just keep what they have and don’t see the point in doing more with their money. Would the state do that better from taxes money? Maybe

        • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          But that means they seek projects that must be profitable and that’s exactly why I want the bloated investment power off their hands and into public projects that value psyche and society in the long run. Profit seeking leads to sick companies like Apple etc. with stances like “the customer should not be able to repair their shit”.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think better regulation of the market so it benefits the consumers, like what EU tries to do, is more realistic than imagining a state being able to sustainably handle marketable innovation. I don’t think a state would have come out with efficient web search, smartphones or gen AI for exemple.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    That honestly says way more about mods than it does about Reddit. Of course you’re not gonna pay for a task people are lining up to do for free, no matter how much they themselves make.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      People do it for free on Lemmy, too. Reddit used to be much more moderator-friendly. I think a lot of remaining mods are just going on muscle memory at this point.

      • De_Narm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, they do. And while I don’t get it on here either, at least they don’t line the pockets of some shitty company. Some moderation is necessary, and I guess I should be happy about other people doing it for free here.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          People do it because they care. I ran /r/StarTrek for over a decade because I wanted a specific type of community to exist that didn’t elsewhere, and reddit made it easy.

          Of course, reddit eventually screwed me (and all of us) with their greed and there was no way to move what we’d built. If a nonprofit reddit-like site existed back then I would hopefully have had the foresight to use it instead.

  • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is why I finally left, because the asshole started removing his volunteer moderators and replacing them with employees for the crime of protesting his lies and slander of app developers who brought in hundreds of thousands of users, many of whom are now reading this comment because they’re no longer on that sinking ship of a site.

    Fuck spez.

    • The Liver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      your username is Fuck spez.

      Spez lives in your head rent-free.

      you need to do something more productive than bitching on about some idiots who run a website to earn money

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is it really a secret that Spez was getting paid a ton and the mods were working for free? I mean CEOs always get paid way too much, or else they wouldnt bother taking the CEO position.

    Also, Im pretty sure all those reddit moderators were doing it for the feeling of power. I mean, why else would you have career mods running hundreds of subreddits while power tripping over everyone all the time?

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re paid with the joy of being powertripping censoring assholes

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Mods are paid in power and the ability to push their opinions. If there are people willing to do it for free then they dont need to pay anyone.

  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So what, give the CEO half and pay the rest to the mods? Like 1300 bucks per year without tax and fees. What would be left? 50 bucks per month? Reddit has like 75000 moderators. Some for huge Subreddits, some for small ones. Equal pay? Or what?

    Someone has to organize all that paying, many are in different countries, different tax laws. In the end, there would be like 20 bucks per month for each. You then would also require extra heavy checks for moderation quality to ensure they are worth their pay. You’d need systems to prevent abuse. If there’s money involved, people become extra greedy. Just pay some of them? Only the ones working a few hours per day? Pay per moderating action? What?

    Or you just do double pay for the CEO. Seems like a no-brainer.