• k110111@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What i am saying is, it is not possible to say someone is an asshole, unless you know the full consequences of someone’s action.

      To say that he is or isn’t both requires us to know this full context.

      I say he isn’t an asshole because of my belief.

      You say he is an asshole because of your belief.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Of course it’s possible to say someone is an asshole without knowing the “full consequences.” Other than you telling me things you can’t possibly prove, I’ve been given no reason to believe that a supposedly omnipotent being allowing 1000 people doing specifically what he commanded them to do die makes him an asshole. If he exists.

        If you have the power to stop 1000 people from dying, then you tell them to do something and let them die (and not peacefully either considering how unpleasant heat exhaustion is), you’re an asshole. And telling me that they will be rewarded later (which, again, you cannot prove) doesn’t make up for it. If I stab you in the eye and then give you $1000, I’m still the asshole who stabbed you in the eye.

        If he doesn’t want to be called an asshole, let him defend himself. Or is he not omnipotent enough to do that and you have to do it for him based on your own unprovable claims?