ylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down11cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up114arrow-down1external-linkUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoSo if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
minus-squareIzzyScissor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoThose are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box. Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoAnd do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?
minus-squareapplepie@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoPaying for labour is toxic to any self respecting capitalist
So if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
Those are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box.
Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
And do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?
Paying for labour is toxic to any self respecting capitalist