• No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would argue it is.

    As the potential next president it is important to judge if he is incorruptible and if there is anything foreign powers could use to blackmail or bribe him into a specific course of action

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be fair “potential next president” already answers if someone is corruptable

    • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Idk about that. Trump only has a problem with this story because the person involved told everyone. If everything was known about any chief-of-state or government candidate in the world, probably you’d find things to use against them in most cases. Even things like this, that are an embarressment rather than any corruption. If a russian asset, rather than Stormy Daniels, had this on Trump, you would not know about it.