I have a very cool Core 2 Duo laptop here that runs Linux Mint.

And it is pretty aweful. Would love to put Fedora Kinoite (Atomic KDE) on there, manual upgrades on shutdown, minimal set of apps.

But I dont know how well Plasma works on such old hardware. It is pretty bloated and messy sometimes, Dolphin and plasmashell are my biggest worries (the whole panel and widget stuff is sooo complex).

Has anyone tried Plasma?

An alternative would be LXQt with KWin once 6.1 comes out and it has full Wayland support.

  • FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I tried it on a real old vista laptop once and it ran terrible, but so did everything that wasnt XFCE. But a core 2 duo might be able to run it acceptably. I say give it a try :)

  • Mint_Raccoon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve used KDE on a Thinkpad T60, it’s about 17 years old, has 3GB of RAM, and a Core Duo. It ran surprisingly well. Replacing the HDD with a SSD can also make a noticeable difference, so you should consider that if you haven’t already. I also turned off a lot of the animations and effects for better performance.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interesting. SSD is not an option as this is not really used and has a huge 1,8TB HDD.

      And it runs very fine for its job.

      I wish plasma had a “energy saving mode” where all this fancy stuff is disabled. Transparency, blur, animations etc.

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have KDE installed on a Core 2 Duo Tower. It runs fine most of the time. About the biggest thing you can get to make that generation of machine Snappy and more livable is an SSD. If you are still running on spinning rust there’s no way any machine is going to be considered usable by today’s standards.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      True. But that old laptop has a 1,8TB HDD (no idea that was a thing back then) and is not really used anymore

  • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I use Fedora KDE Plasma and it’s wonderful, but my machine is pretty new compared to what you’ve got there. As for widgets and panels, what do you mean complex? I’ve had no issues with them.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have tons of issues on Plasma 6 with the whole thing, several bugs reported. Compared to something like cosmic panel widgets, or GNOME or anything else it just seems overcomplex and fragile. I can also imagine this results in lag and performance issues, but idk.

      I mainly use an 11th gen i7 laptop :D

  • produnis@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I observed that the first boot of a new plasma install is quite slow, so that you wonder if it was a good idea to install plasma. But once everything is up, it will be surprisingly fast from that on, and it stays that fast after reboot. So, be patient you fire it up the first time …

  • GravelPieceOfSword@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why not try it for yourself on Linux mint first by installing plasma? Plasma 5 is available on mint - I believe Fedora has plasma 6.

    I use plasma 6 on my Opensuse Slowroll laptop and plasma 5 on my LMDE desktop.

    Overall, I’ve found plasma 6 to run slightly better (I was on plasma 5 on Slowroll too for a long time).

    Once you install and try plasma 5 on your current install, that will be a much less disruptive way to see how well it works for you.

    After ricing, both plasma 5 and 6 are pretty similar on my setup. The cube desktop effect isn’t there by default on plasma 5 of course.