There is no “content” at all. No context on which to dispel my assumptions.
Humans make generalisations from incomplete data, and the generalisation I make is that OP doesn’t realise that the point they are trying to make is (1) extremely poorly made and (2) conducive to being confused for a Nazi.
That statement that you apparently agree with is the content that you ignored in order to compare OP to a Nazi. Or sorry no, in order to claim that OP could be confused for a Nazi.
It’s really important to be scrupulously fair to people who baselessly compare people to Nazis.
There is a difference when you pay attention to the actual content of what’s being said and not just the aesthetics.
See, the Jews don’t control the world, but the police do beat political dissidents. It matters if you care about the truth.
I guess I’m like a Nazi now because I used words, and sometimes Nazis use words.
There is no “content” at all. No context on which to dispel my assumptions.
Humans make generalisations from incomplete data, and the generalisation I make is that OP doesn’t realise that the point they are trying to make is (1) extremely poorly made and (2) conducive to being confused for a Nazi.
What do you think of the statement “the Jews don’t control the world, but the police do beat political dissidents”?
Or are you just really hell-bent on confusing OP for a Nazi?
I agree with that statement. I also never claimed they were a Nazi. Surely your reading comprehension is not that poor, right?
That statement that you apparently agree with is the content that you ignored in order to compare OP to a Nazi. Or sorry no, in order to claim that OP could be confused for a Nazi.
It’s really important to be scrupulously fair to people who baselessly compare people to Nazis.