CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down10
arrow-up171arrow-down1imageRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareLolaCat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoHow about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
minus-squareCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoTruly the best of both worlds.
minus-squareDarkenLM@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThat has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
minus-squaredejf@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoPerhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
minus-squareYakTrimmer@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoLabelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”
How about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
Truly the best of both worlds.
That has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
Perhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
Labelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”