• Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      157
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Forgive them. They aren’t used to choosing their browser yet.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is a proprietary rebranding of Chromium. Can’t say I’d recommend it over (or in addition to) Firefox.

      We need less forks of Chromium. Any one company (Google in this case) having total control over browser engines is dangerous, and is a big reason why the whole Apple/Safari/Webkit situation is such a big deal to begin with.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remember kids, if it’s Chromium based, it’s still part of the problem. The Chromium project only exists to provide the illusion of choice. Don’t let Google have the power to dictate web standards at will.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The worrisome thing is that there’s no alternative other than Firefox, or Safari on Apple platforms. Every single other browser is Chromium.

          We must defend Firefox at all costs, it’s the last glimmer of freedom.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is my go to browser. Brave does a better job with blocking ads. I’m switching to Brave whenever I need to stream something on a site loaded with ads, or when YouTube manages to detect my Adblock for a few days.

    • strawberry@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      as someone said, its randomised, and I’m sure that other browsers also saw more downloads

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is extremely slow on IOS and 2gb+ big. Firefox has no extensions so no Adblock. Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

        Um, Safari is so privacy friendly that Google regularly asks me if I’m human. For example it has “private relay” which is similar to TOR* so trackers don’t even know your IP address — combine that with blocking third party cookies (and even some first party cookies) by default and providing false data to fight fingerprinting even if you don’t block trackers entirely - and blocking them entirely is as simple as installing an extension. Private Relay also adds a layer of encryption on top of DNS queries and otherwise unencrypted http traffic… so your ISP/Cellular provider/Work/School/abusive husband/etc can’t track you

        99.99% of the Safari’s code is FOSS — dual licensed under LGPL and BSD.

        It’s not the browser I use - pretty lacking in the feature department, but it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

        (* if anything, it’s better than TOR… with that service there’s a risk your entry/exit nodes are tracking you. With Private Relay it’s always one of Apple’s servers for the entry node and a reputable cloud company like Akamai for the exit node. Both would have to be compromised in order to identify you… maybe a nation state can do that, but a big data tracking company definitely can’t)

        • smolyeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean they did say few. Generally speaking, every browser is basically safari (WebKit) on iOS and apple doesn’t allow support for 3rd party browser extensions (least natively, Orion supports this somehow). So you’re already limited in that regard. If you don’t use safari , a browser like FF + VPN is IMO a better experience. You also have the option of just using wireguard and controlling your traffic at home/VPS if you’re into that.

          WebKit might be open source but the browser deployed by apple is not. That’s like saying chrome is open source. They both use open source engines.

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

          You have this backwards. Google showing you captchas is basically them saying they can’t match your browser to any know (shadow) profile they have already stored. So they aren’t sure you are a human and if so which one specifically. Getting harassed with a captcha is essentially like a badge of honour for your browsers privacy settings.

          • explore_broaden@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            No they don’t, that’s exactly what they said. Safari makes them do CAPTCHAs so it is the most privacy friendly. It is true that it has better blocking features than Firefox on iOS (because Firefox doesn’t have extensions).

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Firefox has no extensions so no Adblock.

        That’s because so far every browser on iOS had to use WebKit as it’s HTML rendering engine, meaning that even if you installed another browser manually you were basically still using Safari under the hood. IIRC the new DMA rules include allowing other browser engines like Gecko, so Mozilla is probably already working on making addons available. I mean they are available on Android, so why wouldn’t they make them available on iOS now that they finally can?

      • herpaderp@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can get one but not the other. Orion has been pretty solid for me, has all the lovey iOS integration so the happy chemicals Apple spent R&D on does it’s magic while blocking all sorts of things, but it’s closed source :/

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it blocks ads out of the box. I know its new tab screen causes a lot of y’all’s buttholes to clench because it mentions cryptocurrency, but there are harder things to ignore

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Careful, if you try to advocate or defend Brave on Lemmy, you’re stepping on a minefield.

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Idk if I would advocate for or defend it, but I find mobile ads especially abhorrent cuz they take up more relative space on the screen and my upload speed isn’t good enough to be VPNing through my pihole anytime I’m outside the house

          iOS browsers are just skins for Safari anyways, and Brave addresses my issue out of the box, so yeah

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it’s listed as the first item on the browser choice screen for some reason, probably

    • progettarsi@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      8 months ago

      firefox sucks for most people and vivaldi it’s too complicated to configure + it looks like pure bloat

      • max@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why does it suck though? Works fine for me. Granted, I’m a software engineer, but even looking through my “end user glasses”, I don’t see anything wrong with it.

        • latetolemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Granted, I’m a software engineer,

          Lmao love how you inserted “software engineer” there like that supposed to mean something.

          • max@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            In this context, maybe it kinda does. We tend to be techies, so a bit more accustomed to shitty UI/UX than most users.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I wouldn’t say Firefox sucks but there are definitely some things that made me use Edge occasionally back when I used Firefox as my main browser. It was mainly stuff like a webpage that doesn’t support Firefox and extensions not having a Firefox version. Which sure aren’t problems with FireFox, it’s more a problem of it not having enough adoption, but to an end user if the thing they wanna use doesn’t work in FireFox but works in Chrome then that’s FireFox’s fault.

          • max@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve used edge before my university disabled profile syncing (only reason I was using it, to be honest). Edge was fine. Switched to Firefox just to see how it is nowadays, never looked back. Honestly, can’t think of any extension I’m missing. Got quite a few myself, but probably not the same niche as you.
            So far I haven’t encountered broken websites yet. Fingers crossed to keep it that way. Though I’ll probably steer clear of such a website unless absolutely necessary.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have very few issues with Firefox. I fine across a site that does not render properly maybe once every other month. I did have some resource issues with it in Windows 10 with it using too much RAM (regularly using 3-4GB) but that has been fixed since I switch to Linux.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    For god sakes don’t use Brave. Brave has been caught doing shady shit in the past, and the CEO is a piece of shit on top of that.

    Use Firefox with privacy addons.

      • hannes3120@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Vivaldi is the best!

        Currently trying out Floorp as a Firefox fork for the possibility that Google’s disabling of adblockers in the manifest will make it impossible to use chromium browsers which is kind of good, too

        But Vivaldi rules as long as chromium is an option!

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Floorp looks nice and customizable, but in terms of updates it doesn’t seem very sustainable yet.

          • hannes3120@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I get updates every other week

            but I think it’s in a weird spot with not having regular English patchnotes - and afaik they also use an older rendering-engine

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Would you hire a bigot to run your company so long as the numbers go up? Fuck that mentality.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Mozilla was doing poorly when he was CEO as well. Google has been doing everything they can to force Chrome.

            He was CEO for 11 days and in that time all he did was cause a bunch of websites to show a banner requesting that users install a different browser in order to not support a homophobe.

            There was also a boatload of articles about his homophobia that brought Mozilla into disrepute.

            • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The problem is appointing Mozilla leadership based on ideological purity rather than technical merit.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Firstly, who says that’s happening?

                And secondly, this isn’t entirely about purity - even if you personally (and I’m not saying this is your view, btw) don’t give the slightest fuck about gay people and you’re fine with them having fewer rights/fine with others actively trying to strip their rights away - others aren’t, and it’s harmful to the business.

                Eich was CEO for 11 days and achieved nothing other than a Firefox boycott, dozens of negative Firefox headlines, and Firefox being known as the homophobic browser.

                Even from a cold-hearted “fuck human rights, I care only about market share” POV, Eich was still an awful CEO decision.

    • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      But in iOS , addons (ublock origin) are not available at least outside EU, so brave is the better choice as it got brave shield . everywhere else I use Firefox.

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is one issues though… Firefox is extremely slow and clunky. I hate to say it, but on mobile it is hard to use all the time for me. On desktop I’m Firefox 95% of the time but some sites don’t work very well with the much slower JavaScript engine. This isn’t to defend Brave or any chromium browser but we gotta get Firefox up to speed.

      • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is on iOS. There is no Firefox (geko) or Chromium, there is only skins of Safari so your point is moot. For now.

      • RedSeries@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like Firefox has made some really great strides on the performance front. Especially considering how bloated chrome has gotten as a comparison. But… Yeah that’s valid. I love Firefox like 99% of the time but sometimes I’m almost forced to swap to Chrome to get a site to work correctly or reliably.

        • markon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Site devs need to see the threat from browser engine monopolies too. Valve literally started pouring resources into Linux gaming just because Microsoft looked like they were trying to dominate game stores on Windows. Chromium actually dominates the web. I guess at least base chromium is open source. Still though, one of those markets is way bigger than the other and it definitely isn’t Linux gaming. (God I love Proton/WINE and how far we’ve come!)

    • agelord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Could you please clarify why the baseline needs to be at 0? I’m genuinely curious.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      No it doesn’t.

      It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper.

      It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about.

      Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine

        Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean sure I guess… but brave as a browser is atrocious. I don’t trust their bullshit at all.

    After all who doesn’t want a crypto wallet in their browser? that’s the safest place for it right?

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess if you have no experience with it then that’s a perfect response. Meanwhile I’ve got $72 worth of BAT in mine and if it vanished I’d be perfectly fine losing money I never actually owned. I donate to DDG and Wikipedia each month with mine. That’s money they didn’t have so they are fine with that.

      I used to have a lot less but this crypto spike has increased it by a lot so my holdings are exceeding my donations. Might need to give away more.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’ve been using Firefox on my android phones for years though, I don’t remember it ever being more involved then setting it as default on the popup on first launch.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m pretty sure the term jailbreak comes from the term “jail” being used on FreeBSD, which iOS is based on, which is an application sandboxing tool, therefore, a “jailbreak” is a method to escape that sandbox and gain elevated permissions to the system.

          iOS being a jail is a pretty apt analogy, regardless, though.

        • DrCake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          On iOS the browser isn’t really Firefox. It’s just a re-skinned Safari due to apples rules. I think now they are allowed to ship their own engines

    • Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have been using Firefox as the default browser on my iPhone for a while now. It wasn’t complicated to setup either.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Same here but it’s not Firefox with its own Engine, it’s a Firefox frontend for WebKit with some of Apple’s restriction.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There are a bunch of apps that strictly require Chrome for their in-app custom tabs, though. I have to re-install Chrome on occasion because I can’t log into apps without it. Also, having Chrome installed at all makes it impossible to NOT set a default browser (i.e. to have it ask every time), which is what I prefer since I use several different browsers for different use cases. (Note: this is on Pixel. Never had that problem on my older phones.)

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        While we can, we should reject those sites and program them to the standards.
        Including that some features are optional.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have Firefox set up and never was the in-app browser firefox

        How I know? I have dark reader active on those pages and usually websites don’t reflect system primary settings.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think it used to be possible to set your default “custom tabs” browser as well, but I don’t think it is anymore. I’m not totally sure though.

          I don’t know why these apps use custom tabs in the first place. It’s always struck me as a solution in search of a problem.

  • banghida@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    They are probably just trying to pump their token with these posts.

  • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The axis is somewhat misleading. A jump from 8k to 11k installs is nothing.

    Edit: just saw from the comments this is the number of installs per day so its bigger than I thought

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      A jump from 8k to 11k installs is nothing.

      It’s about a third. Imagine if your income went up by 30% in 24 hours, I reckon you’d be pretty happy about that.

      Also - it tends to take months for a new version of iOS to reach a large number of users, and years to reach everyone. So a rapid growth rate (probably not 30%, but still fast) is likely to be sustained over quite a while.

  • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Misleading graph trying to make a 150% increase look like a 1000% increase.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Read the left side? 7k-11k, the removed useless information, provided you read what is actually there first.

      • strawberry@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        no one reads that. didn’t even bother to look. should be more transparent IMO but whatever

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you don’t how are you supposed to know what information it’s telling you? It could shades of purple for all you know.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you realize how most people act and think, you can tell them lies while telling the truth. Which is what people are usually trying to do when they start graphs away from zero.

          • strawberry@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            well yea but this also isn’t like important stuff so I didn’t bother looking

              • strawberry@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                you say that as if everyone analyses every aspect of everything they encounter. most people will glance at the graph, see a huge jump, and not look into it more. that’s why statistics are so easy to falsify or make misleading

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  If you want to engage in a conversation or use that information, yes you should properly read it. What could possibly be added to a discussion otherwise? Just having people have to correct and call out your bullshit? Lmfao.

                  Since you are engaging in comments within a post about this, everyone would assume you read the graph properly, since you obviously can’t add to a conversation without actually knowing the information.

                  So yes, leave your idiocy elsewhere next time, read the shit, or don’t add your opinion, really simple concept.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That doesn’t surprise me, and yes it was always because of anti-competitive practices, so I’m all for more neutrality, I’ll just add 2 shower thoughts:

    1. Seeing that Brave is at the top of the browser list, I wonder how many selected Brave just because it’s at the top of the list and thought that this must be a good choice then, not because they actually like Brave.
    2. It’s nice to have such a thing for browsers, but it would have to be expanded to other apps as well, e.g. mail client. Oh well, maybe in another 10 years or so.
      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nah. I hear your complaint but look up any stock ticker. Starting at 0 would simply cause too much white space and make it hard to see movements.

        The y-axis is clearly labeled allowing us to see that it’s about a 40% jump.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No the axis shows a detailed increase with clearly stated numbers. This is just the first impression.

        We are not talking about Apple graph madness

        apple bullshit

  • lanolinoil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hurry USA! Better find some smallish company to sue for anti trust instead of working on any real issues like this

  • ___@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I used to use brave before they were soured. Ther BAT token disappearing from my account was another nail in the coffin.