One of the amazing political achievements of Republicans in this election cycle has been their ability, at least so far, to send Donald Trump’s last year in office down the memory hole. Voters are supposed to remember the good economy of January 2020, with its combination of low unemployment and low inflation, while forgetting about the plague year that followed.

Since Trump’s romp in the Super Tuesday primaries, however, the ex-president and his surrogates have begun trying to pull off an even more impressive act of revisionism: portraying his entire presidency — even 2020, that awful first pandemic year — as pure magnificence. On Wednesday, Representative Elise Stefanik, the chair of the House Republican Conference, tried echoing Ronald Reagan: “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?”

And Trump himself, in his Tuesday night victory speech, reflected wistfully on his time in office as one in which “our country was coming together.”

Non-paywall link

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      And avoid having to pay judgements. He doesn’t want to pay a single penny toward the various suits he’s losing, he wants to keep them eternally in progress if he can by submitting bonds and then appealing.

      Look at the Carroll judgements. Not that this is any kind of definitive evidence, but he just defamed E. Jean Carroll again even as he is waiting for bond approval from that judge after losing the second trial. Here it is a bit more clearly worded from the NYTimes:

      Just days after Donald J. Trump posted a $91.6 million bond in the defamation case he lost recently to the writer E. Jean Carroll, her lawyer on Monday suggested she was considering filing a third defamation lawsuit against the former president.

      The lawyer raised the prospect of a new lawsuit after Mr. Trump in recent days repeatedly lashed out at Ms. Carroll, using the same kind of disparaging language that led to the huge judgment against him in January.

      Lol, that’s what his strategy is to avoid post-litigation payout forever: keep offending, losing, bonding out and appealing. Lather, rinse, repeat, make his heirs pay up if there’s anything left.

      (archive link to NYT article)

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Every new case is a new case, it has no effect on the timeline for decided cases. Of course, I don’t expect Trump to understand that.

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          it has no effect on the timeline for decided cases

          It can, if his lawyers plead it and the judge is accommodating. His lawyers have absolutely motioned in the past for a specific judge’s planned schedule to be changed to accommodate another judge’s planned schedule, and that to not do so would present an undue hardship. He generally gets these delays, on the whole.