I saw this on a (scammy) dating app and thought it was hilarious.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I almost get this,…

    Who cares what my labels are, if I’m interested in you, that’s that. Whatever you are, whatever I am, we’re done. If we’re having a good time we are winning.

    On the other hand I acknowledge reality dictates that others want to pair with people they understand, and labels are labels because they are effective at helping people convey more complex ideas in efficient packages.

    But then it comes full circle, if I label myself “no label” that’s still a label that coveys more ideas in an efficient package.

    Easier to just have a “N/A” or similar option

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So, what term should they use?

    I mean, you can use ‘human’ for race/ethnic group, or ‘none’ for religion, but there’s no single word I know of for ‘I refuse to state my orientation.’

    Yes, I know it’s not all that likely to come up in casual conversation, but now my curiosity is piqued.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      How about ‘exploring’? En passant? Just browsing? Window-shopper? Touchy-feely? Uncommitted? Liberace? Nebulous? Plasma? Spork? Nothing more comes to mind.

  • HogsTooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think a lot of these started showing up as a way for the LGBTQ+ to label themselves in a “if you’re going to use labels, let me be clear and define myself” sort of way.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Differentiation also makes people feel special. Apparently there’s a big rift between the Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals and the rest of the “spectrum”. The first half find the other half really petty and annoying.