• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why the ad hominem attacks?

    I don’t think you understand what that means.

    Even when it was for me

    You’re alive, dummy. Because you don’t eat soy. If you were allergic to oxygen, that argument might apply.

    Again why the anger?

    What’s this about anger? You might be projecting. So me noting that hemp is cannabis made you feel stupid, so you feel angry. It’s understandable, dw.

    Also you completely failed to respond to them not being available to me as a child.

    “My parents didn’t care about my dietary requirements so that means that it literally didn’t exist”

    I know what it is call. There is a clear definition between hemp and marijuana. Yes they are both part of the cannabis family but we both know you are not buy marijuana seed at the food co-op as a supplement.

    “Marijuana” :DD

    “cannabis family”

    They’re both the exact same plant; cannabis sativa. “Hemp” just refers to the cannabis that isn’t too strong.

    From your comment:

    Just so you know cattle are only grain finished, personally I don’t like the practice. More details in my reply to a different comment. https://lemmy.world/comment/8250179

    As if no cattle was fed only on feed. And then you have the audacity to pretend to be angry at people who don’t understand agriculture. “Grain finished” means “mostly grass fed” and that just isn’t fucking true, hahahahaahah

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ad hominen means trying to win the argument through the properties of the other person.

        It’s a common mistake. Some, uh, less capable people confuse “ad hominem” for “insult”.

        You’re alive. Thus your soy allergy wasn’t a death sentence, was it? Are you dead?

        Hemp IS cannabis, dummy, and most beef are not “grass finished” but feed fed.

        Not like you’re trying to avoid having said something stupid about a thing you don’t understand, is it…? ;>

        • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Okay did you just disagree with the definition of ad hominin? Anyway clearly you are trying to make this devolve into name calling. I guess because you don’t have anything else, I don’t know and honestly I don’t really care.

          I am going to block you because I can and you have nothing productive left to say.

          Good luck buddy.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            No, I didn’t. You misconstrued the definition.

            You think “ad hominem” means “insult”, dumb-dumb.

            Here’s how it works: if I say “you’re wrong because you’re dumb”, that’s an ad hominem. If I say “you’re wrong, here’s extensive reasoning why, and also, on a sidenote, you’re dumb as shit”, that is not an ad hominem.

            The definition is “(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining”.

            "Rather than the position they’re maintaining.**

            You’re having a hard time with this part because you don’t have a position to maintain. :)

            Are you dead? Did having a soy allergy mean that you died? Was it a… death sentence? Am I speaking to the after-life?

            Hemp IS cannabis, anyone thinking it’s a different plant is rather brainwashed and illiterate. (It takes like 10 seconds to check that on Google.)

            “I’m going to block you because you made me feel bad and I’m not man enough to admit when I say something stupid” yeah I’m not surprised :D