If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.
Unfortunately they need to keep the public safe since you just don’t know what the person will do. If they started running at someone you would be thankful hey had the shot lined up.
Yes, gun racks are mandatory here. We like to clutch them when we zoom down the road to work each day with our heads out the window yelling “Yeeeeee-haw!”
If a person deliberately sets themselves on fire, they are fairly committed to hurting only them and no one else. Ever burn yourself? You know that blinding feeling and instant, involuntary reaction to get away from the thing burning you? Imagine that all over your body, the sensation of “get the fuck away” coming from everywhere. You aren’t going to have clear minded murder as your next agenda. It’s going to be either get water or die.
Pointing a gun at a person who is trying to die is stupid and shows the only way the gun weilder can understand is to use their fear and threaten something that is clearly not threatening. If you believe that someone who wants to die and is trying to do it to themselves, is a threat, you’re part of the problem.
the sensation of “get the fuck away” coming from everywhere. You aren’t going to have clear minded murder as your next agenda
Yeah get the fuck away, so you run, likely toward bystanders, or someone who could help. Who you would get accelerant on and injure or kill with you by mistake.
Why did you bring murder up? I never said nor implied that at all. People seek help when they are in danger, they aren’t thinking straight as you said, they aren’t going to realize they would hurt someone seeking help for being you know, on fucking fire. Every situation is unique, obviously you don’t raise a gun at someone on a bridge. But someone on fire who very likely will spook. Yeah, sorry it’s the right call I those cases.
You also don’t know all the details at the time, it’s great to be able to say what you say in hind sight with the information coming after. At that time no one know the persons intent, so yeah, you don’t know they didn’t have murder on their mind either. Until after….
Murder was brought up because that’s what you were talking about about.
If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.
What do you think would happen if a person covered in flame hugged you? They’re covered in accelerant, as you said, and now want to touch you. The fire will travel and will stick. If a person in flame tried to hug you or hold you, you would also be covered in flames and pain and will probably go into shock and die of trauma. Just like he did.
And your claim “every situation is unique” is bullshit bad faith arguing. It’s a phrase there to move goalposts and make anyone arguing with you frustrated and give up instead of trying to answer all your dumb, clumsy ideas that you think are “points” to be made. People self immolate as an act of protest and there has NEVER been a recorded incident of a person using that fire to hurt others.
You have no idea how to argue any good point so you bring up bullshit and then waffle hard on it to make some point that no one cares about. You can do better. Try.
If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.
Unfortunately they need to keep the public safe since you just don’t know what the person will do. If they started running at someone you would be thankful hey had the shot lined up.
You wanna know a great way to stop a burning man from setting other people on fire? A fire extinguisher
But guns are much more accessible.
Too bad they aren’t readily accessible. All emergency vehicles should have them, but I imagine a lot of agencies skirt that requirement.
Also, depending on the accelerant, it likely wouldn’t put them out, so you always need to be prepared for plan B.
Sorry, reality sucks.
are fire extinguishers not legally required in all cars in the US? that’s dumb.
They’re not, but I’d wager they are required in 90+% of US police cars.
Fire extinguisher are not but from what I understand with the comment guns are legally required in all cars in the US ?
Yes, gun racks are mandatory here. We like to clutch them when we zoom down the road to work each day with our heads out the window yelling “Yeeeeee-haw!”
I’m not saying it’s not a good thing to have, but where do you live where it’s legally required? Cause I’ve never heard of that.
The US, where safety comes third.
Cars, no, buildings, yes.
How often do you set your car on fire?
Um, how often do you set your building on fire?
Not enough, quite frankly.
More often than I’ve set my building on fire…
It only takes once.
If a person deliberately sets themselves on fire, they are fairly committed to hurting only them and no one else. Ever burn yourself? You know that blinding feeling and instant, involuntary reaction to get away from the thing burning you? Imagine that all over your body, the sensation of “get the fuck away” coming from everywhere. You aren’t going to have clear minded murder as your next agenda. It’s going to be either get water or die.
Pointing a gun at a person who is trying to die is stupid and shows the only way the gun weilder can understand is to use their fear and threaten something that is clearly not threatening. If you believe that someone who wants to die and is trying to do it to themselves, is a threat, you’re part of the problem.
Yeah get the fuck away, so you run, likely toward bystanders, or someone who could help. Who you would get accelerant on and injure or kill with you by mistake.
Why did you bring murder up? I never said nor implied that at all. People seek help when they are in danger, they aren’t thinking straight as you said, they aren’t going to realize they would hurt someone seeking help for being you know, on fucking fire. Every situation is unique, obviously you don’t raise a gun at someone on a bridge. But someone on fire who very likely will spook. Yeah, sorry it’s the right call I those cases.
You also don’t know all the details at the time, it’s great to be able to say what you say in hind sight with the information coming after. At that time no one know the persons intent, so yeah, you don’t know they didn’t have murder on their mind either. Until after….
Murder was brought up because that’s what you were talking about about.
What do you think would happen if a person covered in flame hugged you? They’re covered in accelerant, as you said, and now want to touch you. The fire will travel and will stick. If a person in flame tried to hug you or hold you, you would also be covered in flames and pain and will probably go into shock and die of trauma. Just like he did.
And your claim “every situation is unique” is bullshit bad faith arguing. It’s a phrase there to move goalposts and make anyone arguing with you frustrated and give up instead of trying to answer all your dumb, clumsy ideas that you think are “points” to be made. People self immolate as an act of protest and there has NEVER been a recorded incident of a person using that fire to hurt others.
You have no idea how to argue any good point so you bring up bullshit and then waffle hard on it to make some point that no one cares about. You can do better. Try.
To seek help or they are panicking. If you thought I meant murder shows your intent of conversation here.
And they NEVER hurt others…? Bold lie to make a point after an assault of fallacies and insults
Never eh…?
He kept pointing the gun after Bushnell collapsed on the ground.