• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like that guy who self immolated and the cop that showed up just a pointed a gun at him until he burned to death?

    • GCanuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair… That really looked like the cop was having a traumatic event. He froze, he wasn’t being malicious.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sounds like he shouldn’t have a gun if he can freeze like that. If he’s trained to pull out a gun when he panics, we need someone new to do the training. If that’s just a thing people do in stressful situations, then no one should have guns.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      73
      ·
      8 months ago

      If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.

      Unfortunately they need to keep the public safe since you just don’t know what the person will do. If they started running at someone you would be thankful hey had the shot lined up.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        78
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You wanna know a great way to stop a burning man from setting other people on fire? A fire extinguisher

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        If a person deliberately sets themselves on fire, they are fairly committed to hurting only them and no one else. Ever burn yourself? You know that blinding feeling and instant, involuntary reaction to get away from the thing burning you? Imagine that all over your body, the sensation of “get the fuck away” coming from everywhere. You aren’t going to have clear minded murder as your next agenda. It’s going to be either get water or die.

        Pointing a gun at a person who is trying to die is stupid and shows the only way the gun weilder can understand is to use their fear and threaten something that is clearly not threatening. If you believe that someone who wants to die and is trying to do it to themselves, is a threat, you’re part of the problem.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          the sensation of “get the fuck away” coming from everywhere. You aren’t going to have clear minded murder as your next agenda

          Yeah get the fuck away, so you run, likely toward bystanders, or someone who could help. Who you would get accelerant on and injure or kill with you by mistake.

          Why did you bring murder up? I never said nor implied that at all. People seek help when they are in danger, they aren’t thinking straight as you said, they aren’t going to realize they would hurt someone seeking help for being you know, on fucking fire. Every situation is unique, obviously you don’t raise a gun at someone on a bridge. But someone on fire who very likely will spook. Yeah, sorry it’s the right call I those cases.

          You also don’t know all the details at the time, it’s great to be able to say what you say in hind sight with the information coming after. At that time no one know the persons intent, so yeah, you don’t know they didn’t have murder on their mind either. Until after….

          • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Murder was brought up because that’s what you were talking about about.

            If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.

            What do you think would happen if a person covered in flame hugged you? They’re covered in accelerant, as you said, and now want to touch you. The fire will travel and will stick. If a person in flame tried to hug you or hold you, you would also be covered in flames and pain and will probably go into shock and die of trauma. Just like he did.

            And your claim “every situation is unique” is bullshit bad faith arguing. It’s a phrase there to move goalposts and make anyone arguing with you frustrated and give up instead of trying to answer all your dumb, clumsy ideas that you think are “points” to be made. People self immolate as an act of protest and there has NEVER been a recorded incident of a person using that fire to hurt others.

            You have no idea how to argue any good point so you bring up bullshit and then waffle hard on it to make some point that no one cares about. You can do better. Try.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If someone is desperate enough to light themselves on fire, they could possibly also manage to be able to run and grab bystanders.

              To seek help or they are panicking. If you thought I meant murder shows your intent of conversation here.

              And they NEVER hurt others…? Bold lie to make a point after an assault of fallacies and insults

              Never eh…?

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    “So, you’re mentally ill and having the worst day of your life? Well…”

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    When the only tool you know how to use is a hammer… Everything becomes a nail.

  • Abird@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is exactly why I’m joining law enforcement. I hate stupid cops. So I plan on taking a spot that could have been given to a dumbass. Understandably, this is probably devicive, but it’s the best answer I could come up with.

    • da_hooman_husky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a legitimate problem - there are educated people that view the position negatively but also wouldn’t join. So the spots stay open for more uneducated people. Some departments are now requiring degrees and new recruits are put through some degree program before starting but that’s only in some major cities… so yeah people are gonna discourage you but keep your head up and keep that attitude, identify the idiots as early as possible (they will make themselves known quick). That’s what I did - I left my cushy engineering desk job, took a crazy paycut and put on the badge… and I talked a women off the top of a parking garage on my second month (didn’t draw my gun or anything 😲🙄)

        • da_hooman_husky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I legit lol’d at this. But in all seriousness - where I work, every action/decision requires me to articulate why. So if I do draw my gun I have to be able to articulate in a consistent and reasonable manner. If I don’t draw my gun, I also have to be able to articulate that. For example, if a man with a rifle is running from me toward a school full of children and I decide to not draw my gun I will absolutely need to be able to articulate that. If an 80 year old in a wheel chair steals a KitKat using no weapons and I draw my gun I better have a good reason. I can’t just say I felt threatened I have to articulate it and it needs to be consistent with everyone’s body cams and witness statements and the physical evidence itself. I’m more than aware that not every department is like this though…

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem with always being a conformist is that when you try to change the system from within, it’s not you who changes the system; it’s the system that will eventually change you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Good luck. Plan ahead for moral breaching moments. They’re going to have you destroy the stuff of homeless people. They’re going to have you pull people over because they “look suspicious”. They’re going to pressure you to lie to the public in service of police-community relations. And more. You cannot become a full police officer without these things happening because you have to go through a probationary period with an officer in “good standing”.

      That period is where they separate the ones willing to conform to the department standard from the ones who will not stray from what they’ve learned in the academy or their own moral standards.

      This is why ACAB.

      That said, if you want to cross that line, be sure beforehand what you’re willing to do to maybe be the one guy who pushes the officer off of George Floyd. (And by maybe I mean you may never see that on your career, especially if you get marked as “too good” and stashed somewhere useful but harmless to them.)

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Once. The other 98 bullets managed to sink a boat carrying a family of five. One did a U-turn and went straight for a baby. IA is investigating the possibility that an officer accidentally used a baby skull seeking bullet in order to source more of those bullets for the police force.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Out of curiosity, how often does something like this actually happen? More specifically: How often does a cop shoot someone who is attempting to commit suicide, who isn’t a threat to anyone else but themself, resulting in their death? Could anyone provide any relevant statistics?

    • ebc@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In Canada it happens too often: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/police-wellness-checks-deaths-indigenous-black-1.5622320

      The scenario is usually the following:

      • A person stops answering their loved one’s calls or makes suicide threats to the loved one
      • The loved one calls the cops to ask them to check in on them
      • Said person answers the door with the weapon they were planning to end their life with in their hands
      • Cops see a weapon, panic and shoot

      What I don’t understand is why cops don’t just disengage / retreat from these situations. In most cases it looks like they were proceeding as if the person had to be stopped / apprehended.

      • da_hooman_husky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is suicide by cop, OP was asking about situations where the subject is not a threat to anyone. A suicidal person with a gun is a threat as they can turn the weapon around and any time (and they often do).

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Except somehow soldiers have more restraint in this situation than cops do. We trained relentlessly on not shooting unless they actually raise the gun up towards you. And talking them down through a language barrier until they could be safely detained or they tried to shoot us.

          Cops shooting the literal second they think someone has a gun is unacceptable when I can get 18 year old asvab waivers to understand restraint.

          • da_hooman_husky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well i think we agree on your last point - and I might have assumed that the scenario is one where the person raises the gun toward the officer. Just having a gun isn’t always a crime, thinking someone might have a gun isn’t sufficient on its own either. Is this in reference to a specific encounter/incident or are we speaking hypothetically?

            I will add though that the military rules of engagement might not do well to be applied to civilians at least that’s the mindset where I am. The idea that the police are like the military has some purpose I’m sure but at the same time it can be destructive - soldiers aren’t dealing with combatants who are in mental turmoil and police aren’t in war zones… I really like to emphasize that because its important to treat everyone with respect and not come in to every situation like its going to be hostile. The way I see it is my job isn’t to just come in and clean up the streets - it’s to enable to public to go about their lives as uninhibited as possible.

        • ebc@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          What’s the threat if they’re alone in their own home?

          • da_hooman_husky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Depends on the situation… you can get so many calls that sound the same but when you get there nothing about them are the same… if someone is jn their home talking to the suicide hotline that is different than someone who calls for armed police in a manor that warrants a high priority response the waiting in your home with a weapon… it COULD be harmless but that behavior is textbook suicide by cop and it happens more than people talk about.

    • Insolentjellyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is a lot of information about “suicide-by-cop”, but I cannot find any statistics about the kind of scene depicted. Mostly, the people killed in these interactions have, or act like they have, a weapon in order to provoke a violent response. Do a search for suicide-by-cop statistics and you get lots of interesting results. Cheers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t have statistics but the stories of, “officers responding to a welfare check killed person having mental breakdown” are a fucking drumbeat in the mental health community.

      Please don’t call the cops. Call for an ambulance or a mental health team if they have them in your area. Do not tell the operator you feel threatened unless you really are. You’ll get a faster response but it will not be predicated on helping the person, they’re going to attempt to restrain them first and foremost in that case and that’s where an OD of Ketamine, electricity, or lead kills them.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I have an autistic son, and the possibility that he could one day interact with police without my wife or I there is the stuff of nightmares to me.

        Elijah McClain

        Linden Cameron

        Those two come to mind immediately. I’m quite sure there are more.

        • ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          My neighbor’s kid is also autistic and on rare occasions used to randomly walk into our house.

          Startled the shit out outta us, but luckily we aren’t the type of cowards who need a gun to feel safe.

    • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      True that, but it does bring down the number of those damned to hell. So long as the police are able to shoot the sinner before the body hits the ground it’s not suicide. I guess they’re just trying to do the Lord’s work and that callous hailstorm of bullets are just his hand.

      👆 Do I need to tag this with sarcasm or was my intent obvious enough?

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know what’s fucked up? What the jumper was threatening (suicide) was a crime. What the police did was not (not in practice, anyway.)

    Sure, it’s technically a crime for them to shoot the guy, but one of them saw he was reaching for a gun. The police are protected so thoroughly by our broken justice system, that it would be largely an uphill battle to argue they deserve consequences for killing a “criminal”.