The high court said in a statement on its website that it “may release opinions beginning at 10 a.m.” Monday, but won’t take the bench.
The court typically issues its rulings from the bench, and the unusual note could reflect the expedited timeline on which it heard Trump’s immunity case and the decision’s extremely sensitive timetable.
This is about the ballot access case, not the immunity case.
Correct
So then it’s an absolute garbage title that doesn’t deserve to be linked here?
The two are related though - if you insist on criminal prosecution to leverage 14A Section 3 (which seems likely, that’s literally the only case it’s ever been used other than public officials of the Confedereacy), then he necessarily can’t simply be immune to prosecution forever or there is no method to apply 14A to a former president.