• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I do wonder if Rivian will be the true winner of the Cybertruck hype

    • cybertruck was new, Exciting, different as announced when there were no EV pickups. Years later, it’s not going so well
    • Ford announced an EV 150 for regular people, but delivered something average for a beyond premium price that no one could afford (and marked way up by dealers)
    • Rivian delivered something futuristic but still fairly normal, for the price range and features they announced. R2 will make or break
    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I currently own a a Tesla Model Y. When the time comes to replace it a Rivian will be on the short list, above anything Tesla currently offers. Access to the supercharger network is a big selling point IMHO.

    • buran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They and Tesla are the holdouts. GM only recently killed phone mirroring but those two never had it.

      I will not buy from any of them.

    • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They never “had” to, since they were already using the open standard of the time. Electrify America, for example, is CCS by default. I figure they’ll continue expanding their own network either way.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      My guess is that they will keep doing what they’ve been doing. Building charging networks in areas for outdoor adventuring, where charging options are limited.

  • cosmic_slate@dmv.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    So I see in the Tesla app that it asks which vehicle you have and if you have the NACS adapter.

    I wonder if this will be used to determine supercharger availability. Like if a vehicle has the plug on the front-drivers side or rear-passenger side, count it as using two chargers so that the available stall count is accurate.

    • buran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It doesn’t work right. I have an ID.4 and even though my local charger is listed on the Tesla site as being CCS compatible with an adapter, selecting my car and claiming I have an adapter still fails to make the site show up in the listings.

      The car has a CCS port and has been tested to work with the magic dock by testers, so it’s compatible. The app needs work.

      VW is strangely silent on this, which is making me think that my next car will not be a VW. That, and Ford got Apple Maps EV routing working and I still can’t get it to see my car.

      • cosmic_slate@dmv.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I did some poking around. It looks like charging stations are actually limited by brand for now.

        When I changed my brand from Ford to anything else, NACS-compatible Superchargers didn’t show up.

        • buran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That doesn’t really make sense considering it’s a charging standard and the entire point of a standard is to avoid problems like this. Hopefully it just means I need a software update for the car.

          Which VW has been very silent about. I’d feel better if they explained what the issue is and what needs to be done to fix it, even if they say it will take time to fix.