Netflix’s live-action Avatar has its heart in the right place, but its pacing and uneven performances leave a lot to be desired.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Please let’s all remember that these are child actors, and they are no responsible for the poor writing or direction in the show. We can be sure they have worked extremely hard and poured their lives into this show, and the ones we should be disappointed with are the showrunners.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the acting is bad, we can be mad at the casting director as well. It doesn’t really matter if they’re child actors, that doesn’t make them immune from being called bad actors. They don’t deserve to get dunked on or solely blamed for the show, but let’s not pretend they don’t play a part in its quality. If they were amazing actors, I’d assume you’d have no issue giving them praise? Why is the opposite not true?

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The problem is people tend to go way the hell overboard when it comes to criticism and some child actors can’t handle it. Look at what happened with Jake Lloyd as an example. Best to just leave the children out of the criticism and make it about the adults who made the decisions.

        • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          People tent to go way the hell overboard on a lot of things. Best to focus on constructive criticism, while keeping in mind the actors are children, rather than to blindly self-censor based on the subject.

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If they were amazing actors, I’d assume you’d have no issue giving them praise? Why is the opposite not true?

        Because they’re children dude. Praise does not have harmful psychological consequences. There is no downside to giving a child credit for doing something well. There is tremendous harm in attacking a child over something they did objectively correctly, but inevitably not to the impossible standards of armchair critics whose entire presence on the Internet is built on giving exaggerated and heartless criticism.

        • wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          like the kid that played Anakin in Star Wars. he caught so much shit over it, that he gave up acting all together.

          In 2012, Lloyd explained that his decision to retire from acting in 2001 was due to bullying at school and harassment by the press, both in response to his role in The Phantom Menace.

        • Beelzebabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Giving praise when it’s not warranted can be bad.

          It should be shown that there is nothing wrong with doing something poorly, and it gives a chance for constructive criticism. I’ve always (kindly mind you) helped the creative kids throughout my life by showing them where they can improve and why. Feel like that gives them more agency and respect than a constant “Of course you did great! You always do great!”.

          Feels good to give praise, but kids pick up on the bs.

          Of course don’t be cruel, and attack and exaggerate (which I don’t think the person you’re replying to was suggesting), but be honest. Kids are people and grow in their abilities the same way. Only getting praise is not the way to grow.

          • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s like saying drinking water can be bad. It’s technically true, but not really relevant to this context.

            Let the kids family, friends, directors, whatever people are actually involved in those children’s lives handle the constructive criticism. The scrutiny these children face is monumental already. There’s no reason for some rando online to give unsolicited acting advice to child actors, and we both know that’s not even remotely how the vast majority of armchair movie critics are going to express their opinions.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          Strawman argument.

          If a kid plays the piano in a shitty way, it’s okay to say “well, he sucks.”

          • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            actually no. That’s called being an asshole. You can say that he has room to improve, or that he’s still learning, or literally anything but “wow they just suck” like some asshole.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No strawman. One is positive and one is negative. That’s why they are different lol

            And no it’s not really okay. You should encourage children.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Being uncomfortable with criticism does not mean immunity from criticism. This isn’t a middle school play FFS, it’s a licensed series for something that already has a large, established fan base. Millions of dollars went into this. People’s careers depended on this. Using “they’re just kids!” to deflect legitimate criticism toward their acting abilities is not only nonsensical, it’s cowardly.

    • blargerer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve only watched the first 2 episodes, and yeah some of the performances come off quite bad, but I think the editing is at least partially to blame. They hold on characters too long and at odd moments completely destroying any sense of natural tempo in conversations.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        yeah there was at least one scene where I was like “what the hell, the actors are awkwardly looking at something that isn’t there, you clearly could have cut away from that take!”

        Btw we have some discussions for the first few episodes on !avatar@lemmy.world if you want to weigh in there

      • nachtigall@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think it was fine overall. But this is one of the few shows where I actually prefer the dub of my native language because the voice acting was rather underwhelming. To be fair the German voice cast is the same as the original show so they have more than 20 years of experience and nostalgia might play a role too 😁