• orrk@lemmy.world
    1·
    9 months ago

    2, and by extension 3 and 4

    Hell depending on what this capital class votes for even 1 might be out the window.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        0·
        9 months ago

        because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute, even the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

        • abessman@lemmy.world
          1·
          9 months ago

          because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute

          Why?

          the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

          Contributing something because you want it is how free software works.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            1·
            9 months ago

            yes, and having a subscription based shareholder system is antithetical to this

            • abessman@lemmy.world
              1·
              9 months ago

              Repeating it doesn’t make it true. As long as the code is released under a FOSS license, the development model doesn’t matter.