Will anyone actually buy this argument?

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’d like to think that this is all some massive gambit by the FCC to get all these assholes on record so they can build some massive RICO case to take them all down in a massive price fixing and defrauding scheme.

    But I am high right now.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Believe it or not, the same study actually said giving me a million dollars is also a good thing

  • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “See when I slap you in the face that’s actually a really nice thing of me to do. Because if I don’t slap you in the face I’d kick you in the groin really hard instead. Do you want to get kicked in the groin? No? That’s what I thought.”

  • rxmc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cable companies say they’ll will raise the price without early termination fees? Oh please. They’ll do that whether there’s early termination fees or not. They’re just threatening to bump it up on the schedule.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    CW: DV >!“we’ll have to raise prices if early termination fees are banned” has a real “look how you made me hurt you” abuser vibe.!<

    I’m imagining the logic is something like “predatory fees generate $xx million in revenue a year, so if we lose that revenue source we will have to put our other fees up to compensate, because as a multi-billion dollar company our shareholders will get all butthurt if our profit drops by a fraction of a percentage point next year”

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Me, the cable company: “If you don’t let me charge people an assortment of fines and fees after they’ve signed up for service, then I’ll increase our base rate before they sign up.”

    Consumers, looking at the high price of cable: “Fuck, I can’t afford this. Guess I won’t sign up.”

    Me, the cable company: “Regulations are destroying my business!!!”

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which is better because then they are being upfront about the charges, and more people can tell them to fuck off.

  • smegger@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 months ago

    Only if they buy the argument that it’s too difficult to explain what the hidden charges are for so they shouldn’t have to.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh look. The “We’ll hurt people a different way if you stop us from hurting them this way!” argument.

    I wonder who else has made that argument? Oh yeah the Mafia and Cartels.

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cable companies “We’ll raise monthly prices if you ban termination fees”

    Lol, they’re going to raise them anyway!

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      CEO’s always think in quarters, they said “we don’t raise monthly prices (in this quarter) if you don’t ban termination fees”

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Thanks for adding the link to the article, but it might be more convenient if you also add the link to the post description.
      Currently this comment is showing up at the bottom of the thread for me.