lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 10 months agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up11.44Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·10 months agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down9·10 months agoThe reason would be to not cost so much…
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·10 months agoIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·10 months agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·10 months agoI do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·10 months agoWhat conversation are we having?
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
The reason would be to not cost so much…
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
Exactly.
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
I do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator