• NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    I know this sounds crazy, but he could not sell them weapons. He is directly supporting what is happening there by doing so.

    Call back carrier groups, stop selling weapons, and let them deal with their own fucking problems that they caused

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It doesnt get much worse than death. Liberals will justify any and every possible action to defend the blue fascist by claiming the red one could be worse. What happened to ‘push him left after the election’

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think left to your satisfaction would be little further than most everyone else wants him, tbf. lol You can’t acknowledge any of the progress he’s made though? Even like, a tiny bit?

          Regarding Gaza, btw, they don’t need our glide bombs to commit a genocide. There’s a whole lot of ways to do an ethnic cleansing, so, you can’t necessarily stop it just by stopping the weapons. It’s not that simple.

          We’d have to sanction them or something, that’d probably do it.

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            acknowledge any of the progress he’s made though

            No. Prior to Gaza, though Im very critical of him, I did acknowledge a few things. Once he prioritized additional money/weapons and refused a ceasefire while bypassing Congress to allocate more weapons, despite what Israel was doing, and pledging unwavering support. Any progress prior to that is irrelevant. Shipping containers had a higher priority than the lives of Palestinians,

            they don’t need our glide bombs to commit a genocide

            While true, without access to US weapons, including white phosphorous which is restricted under international humanitarian law, it would be much harder to accomplish.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh, you’re going to see just how much worse it can get.

          Are you fucking kidding me?? You think this is as bad as it gets? Read a goddamn history book.

          • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Liberals are not that good at projecting outcomes, everything they claimed would happen under Trump if he won 2020 has come true under Biden. So I’ll take your projection with a grain of salt

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean how many genocides did he do?

        Fuck that stupid blowhard, but at least his genocides are only potential futures, Biden is locked in already at 1

        • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          What a simply mornonic take. Trump literally tried to pull out of NATO, and he would kill support for Ukraine. There’s your genocide. Oh, and he wouldn’t handle the Palestine situation any differently, so make that 2.