• ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ai 𝘞𝘪𝘓𝘭 𝘵𝘈𝘬𝘌 𝘖𝘶𝘙 𝘑𝘰𝘉𝘴

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      While I don’t agree with anti-AI people, the fact that some AI generated content is flawed doesn’t imply that all AI content is of bad quality.

      Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        As someone who works with LLMs, they shouldn’t…

        You still need your chatbot to stick to business rules and act like a real customer service rep, and that’s incredibly hard to accomplish with generative models where you cannot be there to evaluate the generated answers and where the chatbot can go on a tangent and suddenly start to give you free therapy when you originally went in to order pizza.

        Don’t get me wrong, they’re great for many applications within the manual loop. They can help customer service reps (as one example) function better, provide more help to users, and dedicate more time to those who still need a human to solve their issues.

        Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

        My opinion right now is that companies want you to believe they are 100% capable of replacing humans, but that’s because people in upper management never listen to the damn developers down in the basement (aka me), so they have an unrealistic expectation of AI coupled with an unending desire for money and success.

        They are replacing them because they are greedy cunts, not because they are replaceable.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          LLMs are excellent at producing high-volume, low-quality material. And it’s a sad fact of life that a lot of companies are perfectly willing to use low quality material in their work.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If they had ever cared about quality, they would have treated their employees with dignity and paid them enough 😬

            • Menteros@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              So there’s this concept called economics which you might want to read up on.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                And has this “economics” business worked for companies today? Has it worked for us?

                • Menteros@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Economics: The study of how people allocate scarce resources for production, distribution, and consumption, both individually and collectively.

                  Maybe you meant to say Capitalism? Capitalism has brought about the greatest wealth and prosperity in the history of mankind. Yes it’s worked for us.

        • yarr@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          While I don’t agree with anti-AI people, the fact that some AI generated content is flawed doesn’t imply that all AI content is of bad quality.

          Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

          While I understand that not everyone shares the same views about AI, it’s important to recognize that just because some AI-generated content might have flaws, it shouldn’t lead us to believe that every piece created by AI is subpar. In fact, numerous companies are actively embracing the use of LLMs to replace their workforces. From astronauts to circus clowns, LLMs are taking over roles once reserved for humans. Nowadays, you can even find LLMs crafting the perfect soufflé at Michelin star restaurants, performing heart surgery, and even serving as head coaches for professional sports teams. The sky is no longer the limit, as LLMs have found a way to transcend it - and it’s only a matter of time before they take on the role of Santa Claus. Merry Christmas from your new AI overlords!

        • XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You still need your chatbot to stick to business rules and act like a real customer service rep, and that’s incredibly hard to accomplish with generative models

          Isn’t that what, for instance, OpenAI’s embeddings are for?

          My opinion right now is that companies want you to believe they are 100% capable of replacing humans

          Probably, but at the moment they can only do it partially.

          They are replacing them because they are greedy cunts, not because they are replaceable.

          I partially agree. I mean, they are greedy cunts but some tasks like translating from/to certain languages can be easily done even with the free ChatGPT demo with better results than Google Translate, so human translators are unfortunately becoming quite replaceable.

        • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s just like a real person. They only difference (afaik) is you can’t as easily tell ai to get back to work.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It feels like you don’t think the people making these decisions see employee salaries as anything but a line item to minimize or “customer service” as a cost liability. They don’t care about customer experience. Hell, they actively want people to get frustrated and give up because it saves the company money.

        • XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          see employee salaries as anything but a line item to minimize

          YES. With and without AI in the mix, anything to maximize benefits. Companies would have a full workforce formed by unpaid slaves if they could. Many companies get rid of their oldest and best paid employees to replace them with cheaper ones. Videogame studios fired employees right after a new game was finished just so they didn’t have to pay any benefits to the devs. We are nothing but a medium to make the top execs of a company richer.

          They don’t care about customer experience

          Not as long as benefits are up to expectations.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you list a few companies that are replacing workforce with LLMs successfully? Without a downgrade in service quality?

        If by “companies” you mean scammers - sure.

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, about the same time crypto will become main currency and NFTs replace traditional art in museums.

      It’s coming, you hust don’t understand. /s

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Lizards don’t get ligma I think, but hard to say since it’s a fictional decease… :)

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Mark Zuckerberg is an average human man who enjoys many average human hobbies such as movie theater and nutritional supplements.