• assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not necessarily against legalizing other drugs, but I would need a lot of time to research it and understand what studies have been done. There’s some substances which are outright harmful and people shouldn’t take, and I don’t think criminalization is the solution. But, I also don’t know that complete legalization is.

    Off the cuff, I think I’d support decriminalized possession, but the material is still confiscated. Manufacturing however should remain illegal (other than for weed) because it’s way too easy to make snake oil and impurities. I’d favor official govt meth versus making manufacturing it legal.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      You know that there’s government legal meth, right?

      Its brand name is Desoxyn.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Our air force crews are often given one of these during combat missions. I imagine other military units use them when necessary, too. They also prescribe it to people with severe narcolepsy.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Desoxyn is literally a brand name for methamphetamine, so you’re not saying anything different.

          • DanVctr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Wow I just went down a rabbit hole… I feel (pray) so many things would have to fail for you to actually get that Rx filled tho

            • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s a very effective medicine, though. For example, in small doses it’s more effective than adderall or Ritalin for ADHD. It’s less common than either of those drugs because there is a higher abuse potential, but there is nothing really wrong with it either.

              The key here is small doses taken orally. Taking it in a medical context is a very different animal than recreational methamphetamine.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean we know people will do it regardless, no matter the substance. Substances are being thoroughly tested, and finally seeing serious academic and clinical research on their therapeutic uses, so that is actually going pretty great and showing awesome results (yeyy drugs!!), and I will never get over the argument that prohibition only strengthens the mafia.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah you really cut out the leg from cartels if you get rid of prohibition.

        I think as long as we can positively ID a substance as coming from a safe manufacturer, it’s fine. Street products cooked up in a trailer are what need to go away. That probably means the government subsidizes drug companies to provide them at low cost.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fuck it manufacture it in government labs, make it taxable. How could that possibly ever be worse than the street wars we have right now?

    • Kusuriya@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      you know all of those “illegal” drugs are legal if you have enough money? There isn’t a single “illegal” drug that you cant get as long as someone slaps like a Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, or Bayer label on it and signs their name to say you can have it. Prohibition doesn’t work, we have a lot of history to show that, we also have a lot of history to know that treatment, rehabilitation, and social safety nets go a really long way towards stopping addiction and substance abuse.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, I think I mostly agree. Don’t think material should be confiscated though, that could cause people to avoid official harm reduction resources. But, I wouldn’t want to see private business, like gas stations, liquor stores, or “dispensaries” making profit from selling and pushing fentanyl, tranq, krokodil and stuff like that. I do think more drugs with low addiction and harm potential should be legalized such as shrooms, LSD, and probably most psychedelics.

      All that being said all legalization and decriminalization must coincide with massive investment in addiction treatment, harm reduction, and probably housing. Ideally, the root causes of the drug epidemic should be addressed, such as poverty, lack of adequate healthcare such as therapy, people generally feeling hopeless because of their material conditions, etc.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Completely agree on everything except confiscation – which I agree is tricky. I think you confiscate anything that’s “off brand” to keep them off the streets, but that’s it. I don’t want some shitty chemist making impure drugs that cause serious harm. Those need to go. We’d need a free certified container program.

    • skrufimonki@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      All you need to do is look at Portland Oregon. We decriminalized possession with Measure 110 and everyone rejoiced. Now most people are done with it. Used paraphernalia every where, homelessness everywhere. (Yeah I know housing prices is the major factor). Crime… Fuck me. The amount of people that have been “assisted” with their drug habits are dismal. In part due to government hindering the financial support. The major part is the lack of desire from users wanting to be saved. ( This is the alternative to jailing of persons) Decriminalization of possession of hard drugs was/is a major fail here. Just my anecdotal “research”.