HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1378arrow-down10
arrow-up1378arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareAgentGrimstone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·9 months agoJeezus, can we have “Single” back?
minus-squareToribor@corndog.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 months agoWould you say you’re in a relationship, between relationships, or utterly hopeless? Are you a child, a young adult, or are you vividly aware of the cold embrace of death coming to claim you?
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoIt asked for travel status, not relationship
minus-squareperviouslyiner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoPossible problem with using that in rail tickets is that ‘single’ can also mean a one-way journey. It should be number of people: “1”, “2”, “4 & 4 children (up to)”
Jeezus, can we have “Single” back?
Would you say you’re in a relationship, between relationships, or utterly hopeless?
Are you a child, a young adult, or are you vividly aware of the cold embrace of death coming to claim you?
It asked for travel status, not relationship
Possible problem with using that in rail tickets is that ‘single’ can also mean a one-way journey. It should be number of people: “1”, “2”, “4 & 4 children (up to)”