‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    if it’s impossible for you to have something without breaking the law you have to do without it

    if it’s impossible for the artistocrat class to have something without breaking the law, we change or ignore the law

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh sure. But why is it only the massive AI push that allows the large companies owning the models full of stolen materials that make basic forgeries of the stolen items the ones that can ignore the bullshit copyright laws?

        It wouldn’t be because it is super profitable for multiple large industries right?

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just because people are saying the law is bad doesn’t mean they are saying the lawbreakers are good. Those two are independent of each other.

          I have never been against cannabis legalization. That doesn’t mean I think people who sold it on the streets are good people.