• butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Pro-eugenics?”

    saying modern life is so comfortable that intelligence is no longer an evolutionary advantage isn’t pro-eugenics, it’s the fucking truth. As far as anti-democracy, I am actually an Arkansas inbred, and my vote against magatardism goes straight in the trash thanks to the electoral college.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Intelligence is still very much an evolutionary advantage. Idocracy isn’t science and getting your ideas about evolution from a mark judge film is not a sign of intelligence.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re just asserting something without evidence too.

        You know, generally as wealth increases birth rate decreases. Just look at the population crises coming up around the developed world.

        • jackalope@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fertility goes down as wealth increases because developed industrial societies don’t use child labor and infant mortality has gone way down. It’s not because intelligence is a disadvantage.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          You know, generally as wealth increases birth rate decreases. Just look at the population crises coming up around the developed world.

          This is the exact opposite of why people are having fewer kids in areas with population crises.

          People generally have fewer kids in developed nations than in developing nations because all of their children are likely to survive.

          Population crises arise due to social and economic factors.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              One can easily make the argument that the children are surviving because of the increased wealth.

              That is the argument, yes

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              My only disagreement is where population crises come from. These are cultural and economic issues, generally, not necessary consequences of wealth building.

              Otherwise yeah you’re spot on