• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Moore’s law has been dead for a long long time.

    E: if you’re downvoting this it’s because you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Moore’s law was the observation that transistor density would double every ~2 years. That’s not happening and hasn’t for a long time.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No need to downvote this. It’s an insidery technically correct statement. We’ve redefined how we measure Moore’s law several times to make it “keep working” and some people designing chips, not selling them, think it’s not only outlined it’s usefulness but also not true anymore.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my experience, a lot of people incorrectly conflate Moore’s Law with “computers get faster”

        So when you say Moore’s Law is dead and it’s unrealistic to expect it not to be, they get upset and jump to the conclusion that you’re defending tech companies for giving paltry upgrades, which obviously isn’t what I’m doing.

        There are other things to PCs getting faster in a post Moore’s Law world. Architecture improvements, hardware acceleration, advanced packaging such as AMD’s chiplet technology, etc - these are all commonplace and have replaced the idea of “let’s just double transistor counts every two years”

    • fugacity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moore’s law hasn’t died, if you mean number of transistors per area. Linear scaling to transistor counts has.