• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What I think is interesting is just how variable it is. This Wikipedia article breaks it down by state. There’s no obvious political explanation here, and even very similar states have very different energy production.

          For example, here’s the top 10 (with 2016/2020 presidential party vote):

          1. Vermont (D) - 99.7%
          2. South Dakota ® - 82.7%
          3. Washington (D) - 81.9%
          4. New Hampshire (D) - 71.6%
          5. Idaho ® - 70.2%
          6. Maine (D) - 66.1%
          7. Oregon (D) - 65%
          8. Illinois (D) - 64.5%
          9. South Carolina ® - 60.8%
          10. Kansas ® - 60.8%

          And the bottom 10 (ignoring DC):

          41 - Massachusetts (D) - 17.8%
          42 - Ohio ® - 17.4%
          43 - Florida ® - 17.4%
          44 - Missouri ® - 16.6%
          45 - Utah ® - 12.4%
          46 - Indiana ® - 9.8%
          47 - Kentucky ® - 7.6%
          48 - Rhode Island (D) - 7.2%
          49 - West Virginia ® - 5.1%
          50 - Delaware (D) - 3.2%

          So 6/10 of the top 10 are states that voted Democrat, and 7/10 of the bottom 10 are states that voted Republican. That trend doesn’t really tell the story though (3 of the next 5 voted Republican), which is really interesting because it’s such a political talking point at the national level (e.g. Dems are in favor of green energy, Reps are in favor of fossil fuels).

          Even some very similar, adjacent states have very different generation numbers:

          • Alabama (43%) vs Mississippi (20%)
          • Idaho (70%) vs Utah (12%)
          • Tennessee (59%) vs Kentucky (8%)

          So there’s a lot of progress that can be made at the low end by pointing at their neighbors.