A community for people who enjoy using base twelve and prefer it over base ten

  • Katie Ampersand@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    The problem with “duodecimal” is that it’s in base ten, which makes it unfitting for a community centered around replacing base ten

    • X51@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I hate to break the news to you, but a “dozen” is defined as a “group of 12” which is also a reference to Base-10. You might need to come up with a new word that doesn’t reference Base-10. The inherent problem with switching to Base-12 is that we only have 10 fingers. If you switch to Base-12, 90% of the Earths population is going to be too stupid to count to 12. If we weren’t wearing shoes, I think people could figure out how to count to 20, but Base-20 would not have as many advantages as Base-12.

      • Katie Ampersand@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago
        • you can also say that a dozen is a group of 1100, does that mean that a dozen is a reference to binary? of course not, that doesn’t make any sense. just because you can use decimal digits to write a definition doesn’t make it a decimal-centric definition. duodecimal is decimal-centric not because of its definition, but because it’s literally “two(duo) ten(decimal)”

        • there are a lot of ways to count to 12 with only two hands. some with only one hand

        • X51@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          All the dictionary definitions of these words use Base-10 references. You need to rewrite the definitions and have them accepted into the human language globally if you want something that disregards Base-10. Personally, I think “Dozenal” sounds uneducated. The wikipedia redirects to Duodecimal. I am inclined to believe Base-12 does have many advantages over Base-10.