• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What I hate to see, even in this thread, is people turning on each other in this “us vs. them”, “you’re either a part of the pact or you’re against us” nonsense

    Let’s all remember why WE ALL CHOSE to get on the fediverse and build it. The strength of the fediverse comes from the freedom for each instance to choose how to run things. My understanding is that no one in an instance is harmed if some other instance chooses to federate or defederate from Threads.

    I hate Meta. I also know that Meta doesn’t need to do anything to take down the fediverse if we do it ourselves.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Part of it is just today’s polarized political climate, especially since the popularity of the Fediverse is partially a backlash to reactionaries taking over Twitter and the corporate enshittification of Facebook and Reddit.

      Everything is a war now, and solidarity and boycotts are basically the only weapons that small, independent actors have. So people apply “don’t cross the picket line” thinking to everything, even where it doesn’t make sense.

      Want to act properly? Contribute money and labour towards your instances. Help them build better moderation tools so they can handle the flood of crap from Threads, and onboarding tools and better UX so they can steal away the Threads users.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ditto. I also try to file good, clean bug reports with detailed repro steps where I hit them. Not just “it’s busted, fix it”. I’d love to contribute actual code, because I’d like to think I’m a really good programmer (been coding professionally for decades), but actually fully getting a hosted Masto instance up to the point where you can edit the code and see it live is a freaking nightmare.

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        “The flood of crap” isn’t what people should be worried about. They should be worried about Meta embracing, extending, and extinguishing the Fediverse. There’s a good article about this here. People are worried about the wrong things and don’t realize what’s at stake.

        • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Ploum article again. Please explain how the circumstances with XMPP and ActivityPub are remotely similar.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well that and the story while not “wrong”, is definitely hyperbolic. The author even stated after stating that Google killed XMPP that they didn’t. So which is it? I’m not a dev, but an avid open source fan. i first tried Linux in 1995. Started using jabber itself in 1999 through Gaim. Later pidgin and psi clients in 2001-2. There were a ton of problems beyond Google. As far as clients were concerned there was no reference version. And there really were no large professionally run servers like mastodon.social or lemmy.world. People, myself included put too much hope in the Google basket. It was a massive unearned win in user count. That was just as easily lost. And kept people from focusing on the core service. Yes Google was never a good steward. Corporations never are. But the lack of official clients and servers, plus their decision to persue IETF standardization had as big or bigger impact on the services development and adoption.

            The moral of the story isn’t that Google or anyone else can kill an open source project. Microsoft Google and many more have tried and failed. The moral is that we shouldn’t cater to them or give them special treatment. They aren’t the key to success.

          • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Both are open protocols for communication over the Internet. Both have been adopted by a large corporate interest.

            Now, how are they different?

            • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I asked how the circumstances are similar, not vague descriptions that suit your existing views. But sure.

              XMPP was dogshit back in 2004. A good idea, but nowhere NEAR what it needed to be to actually get mainstream acceptance. ActivityPub is light years ahead.

              There were very very few XMPP users in 2004. There are millions of ActivityPub users. If meta was to pull the plug on federation it wouldn’t kill ActivityPub, there would still be millions of us here. We joined Lemmy/Kbin/Mastodon because we don’t want to live in a centrally controlled/owned social platform. That won’t change just because we can suddenly interact with Threads users. In fact, if anything, once Threads users hear that we get the same shit they do without the ads, they might decide to join us instead.

              Google killing off XMPP integration didn’t kill XMPP. It did that all on its own.

              • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If meta was to pull the plug on federation it wouldn’t kill ActivityPub, there would still be millions of us here.

                It’s not about pulling the plug. It’s about introducing proprietary features that break communication, forcing people off of an independent server and onto Threads.

                If most of your IRL friends are on Threads and your experience with them has gotten janky due to Meta fucking with the protocol, it’s going to be very difficult to not switch over to Threads.

                Oh, and good luck trying to get your friends to switch over to some indie server they’ve never heard of. If you can do that, then you should run for president.

                • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So basically, the worst thing Meta could do is what the defederators are actively campaigning for: To make it impossible for Threads and the Fediverse to communicate.

                  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The difference is the stage at which they “advocate” for it.

                    People here are advocating for it now before Facebook has a chance to “embrace” us.

                    Facebook would only “advocate” for it after they’ve “embraced” us and started to “extend” ActivityPub with proprietary features that potentially caused issues with Lemmy users.

                    With the former, Lemmy continues on its own, growing naturally. With the latter, Lemmy users lose contact with communities they’ve become a part of and may be forced to move to Threads to continue interacting with their communities. That harms Lemmy’s active userbase. Additionally, because of how big Threads is, it’d naturally have the largest communities, so other Lemmy users would start using them instead of communities on other instances. That means those communities would shrink and may even die off entirely. When Facebook cuts off ActivityPub support, that’ll leave us with several small or abandoned communities. So we’d end up with a smaller userbase and fewer active communities.

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not personally in favor of preemptively blocking threads on my instance and I don’t find the EEE argument at all convincing in this case. But other instances doing that is no problem at all, it’s fine!

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that no one in an instance is harmed if some other instance chooses to federate or defederate from Threads.

      It does kinda hurt the Fediverse as a whole when it becomes so segregated.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is

        I’m not sure if defederating is the correct counter to it

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Defederating from known-bad-actor corporations during the “embrace” phase seems like a perfectly wise choice to me. Keeps them from getting to stage 2.

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s not about us embracing them, it’s about them embracing the protocol, which they can do whether we stay federated or not.

            The argument against defederation is that it tells newcomers that the defederated instance is an island and they’re better off joining the place where they can talk to their friends. Meta can more easily extend if we’re not around to explain why extending is a bad thing, and if we’re not around to advocate for people to ditch Meta’s platform and join an open one

            Here is what it actually means

            Embrace: Development of software substantially compatible with a competing product, or implementing a public standard.
            
            Extend: Addition and promotion of features not supported by the competing product or part of the standard, creating interoperability problems for customers who try to use the "simple" standard.
            
            Extinguish: When extensions become a de facto standard because of their dominant market share, they marginalize competitors that do not or cannot support the new extensions.
            
            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it’s naive to imagine that anything we say or do will influence Meta’s behavior or strategy in any way. But I do see your point that when an instance defederates from Threads, it makes an island of itself, not of Threads.

    • calvinbacon@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fediverse can’t be all star trek memes, maybe go lay on the fainting couch if your blood sugar isn’t high enough