• ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course they are. They saw what happened when all the kids who grew up watching sesame street and Mr Rogers learned how to think of other people as people and not things. They started supporting their right to exist! As valid individuals! With RIGHTS!?!

    Conservatives can only prosper if empathy is suppressed, or at least heavily restricted. You see it every time yet another conservative changes their position on some social issue as soon as they experience whatever it is firsthand.

    If they had empathy, they would’ve already supported the progressive position.

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    TL;DR?

    Banning SEL makes as much sense as banning the alphabet because the letters can be used to say bad or hurtful things.

    Also, banning stuff has such a history of positive outcomes.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      …at least 25 states saw bills introduced into their legislatures to remove social and emotional learning (SEL) from public school curricula. While most failed, the bills rely on talking points developed by right-wing SEL opponents who liken lessons meant to increase students’ emotional intelligence — teaching them skills like empathy, collaborative problem-solving and emotional self-regulation — to a Trojan Horse for left-wing ideologies of race, gender and sexuality.

    • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh its not bullshit. They just redefined “empathy” and “care”, and since it hasnt updated, theyre no longer teaching empathy and care. Because empathy and care mean something else.

      English evolves, never complain or be out of date, no matter how forced and unnatural it is.