• Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The electors only exist because it made it possible to hold a vote across a large nation in a time when horses were the fastest mode of communication. And each elector was supposed to carry the results of the same number of voters.

    But the country has grown, with some states growing in population much faster than others. Yet the number of electors remains unchanged. Not to mention electors are now completely unnecessary as we have fast and reliable communication methods.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You can disagree with the electoral college and still recognize that electors are literally representatives.

      This is basic civics.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But they aren’t really, they’re just vote messengers, they aren’t on capital hill making laws and advocating for their constituents.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          All representatives are “vote messengers.” That’s why we call them representatives.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would disagree that senators and congressmen are just vote messengers. They run on active platforms, respond to changes in their constituencies (hopefully), deal with new issues as they arise.

            Electors literally just ferry the states vote to Washington, that’s it and job done. Representatives continually represent the will of their constituents through multiple years, or at least that’s what they are supposed to do.